Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34710983›Full record

SynthesisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2021

Mobile health interventions for improving colorectal cancer screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anton Elepaño, Alyssa Samantha Fusingan, Eric Yasay, Jereel Aron Sahagun

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effectiveness of mobile health intervention in colorectal cancer screening in Iran.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Text-message reminders to increase participation in colorectal cancer screening.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anton ElepañoDepartment of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Alyssa Samantha FusinganDepartment of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Eric YasayDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Jereel Aron SahagunDepartment of Medicine, University of the Philippines-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of different mHealth interventions in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates.

methodsA literature search for eligible studies was done in ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Scopus in October 2020. Included studies were randomized controlled trials done on adults due for CRC screening, who received either an mHealth intervention to promote screening or usual care. The primary outcome from these studies was completion of CRC screening. Two reviewers independently worked on selecting studies, collecting data, and determining risk of bias. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for CRC screening rates were summarized into a Forest plot.

resultsA total of ten trials from three continents were included in the qualitative analysis. Risk of bias is low in terms of randomization, but high in terms of participant blinding, due to the nature of the interventions. Meta-analysis of four trials showed low clinical and statistical heterogeneity (I2=0%). Overall, the use of mHealth interventions is associated with higher CRC screening uptake when compared to usual care (AOR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.20-1.46). This effect was seen across different types of mHealth interventions, which included automated and non-automated telephone education and text-message reminders.

conclusionThis study showed that mHealth is associated with increased CRC screening participation regardless of the type of intervention used.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiasColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerHumansMiddle AgedOdds RatioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTelemedicineTelephoneText MessagingColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34710983
PMCPMC8858239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.