Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34710840›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors2022

Device features and user behaviors as predictors of dependence among never-smoking electronic cigarette users: PATH Wave 4.

Ashley E Douglas, Margaret G Childers, Katelyn F Romm, Nicholas J Felicione, Jenny E Ozga, Melissa D Blank

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of Dependence Measures for Exclusive Electronic Cigarette Users.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley E DouglasDepartment of Psychology, 53 Campus Drive, 2214 Life Sciences Building, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States. Electronic address: aed0034@mix.wvu.edu.
Margaret G ChildersDepartment of Psychology, 53 Campus Drive, 2214 Life Sciences Building, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States. Electronic address: mgc0002@mix.wvu.edu.
Katelyn F RommMilken Institute School of Public Health, 800 22nd Street NW #7000C, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, United States. Electronic address: kromm@email.gwu.edu.
Nicholas J FelicioneDepartment of Health Behavior, 665 Elm Street, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14216, United States. Electronic address: Nicholas.Felicione@RoswellPark.org.
Jenny E OzgaDepartment of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, 3602 Collins Ferry Road, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, United States. Electronic address: jeozga@hsc.wvu.edu.
Melissa D BlankDepartment of Psychology, 53 Campus Drive, 2214 Life Sciences Building, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States. Electronic address: mdblank@mail.wvu.edu.
West Virginia University · USGeorge Washington University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Research Training Program in Behavioral and Biomedical SciencesT32GM132494 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Anne Courtney DeVries, Kevin T Larkin · 2019 to 2026
$2.8M
Predicting longitudinal patterns of change in adolescent polytobacco use: A socio-ecological frameworkR21DA051628 · NIDA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI BLANK, MELISSA D · 2020 to 2021
$433k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA051628NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM132494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectronic cigarettes (ECIGs) vary greatly in their ability to deliver nicotine, which suggests they may also vary in their ability to produce dependence. This study examined individual and combined ECIG device features, and also user behaviors, as predictors of dependence in never-smoking ECIG users. Methods Data were collected from 711 current ECIG users who had smoked <100 cigarettes in their lifetime at Wave 4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Multivariable linear regressions examined individual (e.g., contains nicotine, uses a tank, flavor preference) and combined (e.g., refillable tanks, refillable mods) device features, and user behaviors (e.g., uses/day) as predictors of dependence, withdrawal, and craving after accounting for demographic variables. Results Results for ECIG dependence and craving showed a similar pattern; higher levels were observed for older age, more frequent past 30-day use, using an ECIG containing nicotine (vs no nicotine), and using a non-refillable cartridge or refillable tank style (vs disposables). Higher withdrawal levels were observed for higher education levels and individual device features of tank (vs no tank), cartridge (vs no cartridge), refillable (vs non-refillable), and "other" flavor preference (vs tobacco flavor). Lower withdrawal levels were associated with a preference for sweet/fruit flavor(s) (vs tobacco flavor). Conclusions Few use behaviors and device features, whether examined alone or in combination, predicted dependence-related outcomes. Findings underscore the challenge with regulating ECIG products in the current marketplace, which is inundated with a myriad of device types.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAgedHumansNicotineSmokersSmokingNicotineBehaviorDependenceDeviceElectronic cigarettePATH studyWithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID34710840
PMCPMC8629948
OpenAlexW3209607800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.