Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34710521›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2022

Contemporary Outcomes After Multimodality Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer Presenting With Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Node Involvement.

Kevin Diao, Lauren M Andring, Carlos H Barcenas, Puneet Singh, Huong Carisa Le-Petross, Valerie K Reed, Jay P Reddy, Elizabeth S Bloom, Neelofur R Ahmad, Lauren L Mayo and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: NeoSTEEP.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin DiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology. Electronic address: kdiao@mdanderson.org.
Lauren M AndringDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Carlos H BarcenasDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology.
Puneet SinghDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology.
Huong Carisa Le-PetrossDepartment of Breast Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Valerie K ReedDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Jay P ReddyDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Elizabeth S BloomDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Neelofur R AhmadDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Lauren L MayoDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
George H PerkinsDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Melissa P MitchellDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Kevin T NeadDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Welela TereffeDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Benjamin D SmithDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Wendy A WoodwardDepartment of Radiation Oncology.
Anderson University - Indiana · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Estimating the Cost Trajectories and Projecting the Cost of Cancer Care in the United States: Methodology and ApplicationR01CA225646 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LI, LIANG, SHIH, YA-CHEN TINA · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Technology Diffusion in Cancer: Geographic Variations, Facilitators, Outcomes, and CostsR01CA207216 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHIH, YA-CHEN TINA · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207216NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with breast cancer and ipsilateral supraclavicular (SCV) node involvement at the time of diagnosis (TNM cN3c) have historically had poor outcomes. Radiation therapy (RT) has an important role because SCV nodes are not routinely surgically dissected. However, optimal locoregional management, contemporary outcomes, and prognostic factors are not well defined. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reviewed the data of patients with cN3c breast cancer treated at our institution between 2014 and 2019 with curative intent, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant RT. All patients received comprehensive regional RT, including to the SCV nodes. Institutional guidelines recommend a 10-Gy or 16-Gy boost to resolved and unresolved N3 nodes, respectively. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and supraclavicular recurrence-free survival (SCRFS) were analyzed.

resultsData from 173 consecutive patients were analyzed with a median follow-up time of 2.8 years. The median age was 54 years, 76 patients (44%) were estrogen receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative, 100 patients (58%) had T3/4 disease, and 10 patients (6%) underwent a neck dissection. In addition, 156 patients (90%) received a cumulative SCV dose of ≥60 Gy. The 5-year OS, SCRFS, LRRFS, and RFS rates were 73%, 95%, 86%, and 50%, respectively. The 5-year OS rate for a cumulative SCV dose of ≥60 Gy versus <60 Gy was 75% versus 39% (P = .04). In the multivariable analysis, a cumulative SCV dose of ≥60 Gy, extranodal extension, receptor status, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were associated with OS. The 5-year SCRFS rates with and without neck dissection were 100% versus 95% (P = .57). Among patients with a postchemotherapy SCV node size of ≥1 cm without neck dissection, the 5-year SCRFS rate was 83%.

conclusionsIn one of the largest series of patients with cN3c breast cancer, multimodality therapy using adjuvant RT with a SCV boost resulted in a 5-year LRRFS rate of 86%. There is a limited role for neck dissection as the 5-year SCRFS rate was 95% overall and 83% for residual SCV disease ≥1 cm after chemotherapy with RT alone. A cumulative SCV dose of ≥60 Gy was associated with improved OS, but not SCRFS, LRRFS, or RFS. A SCV boost should be considered in these patients as treatment was well-tolerated. Despite advances in systemic therapy, nearly half of patients developed distant metastases, highlighting the need for close observation after treatment.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID34710521
PMCPMC8688264
OpenAlexW3208558483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.