Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34710378›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2021

Why are large conformational changes well described by harmonic normal modes?

Yves Dehouck, Ugo Bastolla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yves DehouckCentro de Biologia Molecular "Severo Ochoa," CSIC-UAM Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: ydehouck@cbm.csic.es.
Ugo BastollaCentro de Biologia Molecular "Severo Ochoa," CSIC-UAM Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: ubastolla@cbm.csic.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-frequency normal modes generated by elastic network models tend to correlate strongly with large conformational changes of proteins, despite their reliance on the harmonic approximation, which is only valid in close proximity of the native structure. We consider 12 variants of the torsional network model (TNM), an elastic network model in torsion angle space, that adopt different sets of torsion angles as degrees of freedom and reproduce with similar quality the thermal fluctuations of proteins but present drastic differences in their agreement with conformational changes. We show that these differences are related to the extent of the deviations from the harmonic approximation, assessed through an anharmonic energy function whose harmonic approximation coincides with the TNM. Our results indicate that mode anharmonicity is more strongly related to its collectivity, i.e., the number of atoms displaced by the mode, than to its amplitude; low-frequency modes can remain harmonic even at large amplitudes, provided they are sufficiently collective. Finally, we assess the potential benefits of different strategies to minimize the impact of anharmonicity. The reduction of the number of degrees of freedom or their regularization by a torsional harmonic potential significantly improves the collectivity and harmonicity of normal modes and the agreement with conformational changes. In contrast, the correction of normal mode frequencies to partially account for anharmonicity does not yield substantial benefits. The TNM program is freely available at https://github.com/ugobas/tnm.

Indexed as

ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID34710378
PMCPMC8715200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.