ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2021
Exploring the efficacy of tumor electric field therapy against glioblastoma: An in vivo and in vitro study.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor Electric Field Therapy Inhibits Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Invasion, and Migration of Glioblastoma by Targeting the c-FOS/CXCL14 Axis.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Tumor Electric Field Therapy Inhibits TGF-β/C1R Signaling Axis-Driven Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Glioblastoma.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- New experimental therapies for glioblastoma: a review of preclinical research.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Review
- The Evidence That Brain Cancers Could Be Effectively Treated with In-Home Radiofrequency Waves.Cancers · 2025Article
- Advances in Cellular Immune Theranostic Approaches for Glioblastoma: Current Trends and Future Directions.Cancer innovation · 2025Review
- An Analysis for IDH-Mutant Grade 4 Astrocytoma Based on WHO CNS 5: Implication of Clinical Practice.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025Article
- Advancement in tumor treating fields of mechanism, clinical applications, and future directions.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Tumor-treating fields in cancer therapy: advances of cellular and molecular mechanisms.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
- Glioblastoma Tumor Microenvironment: An Important Modulator for Tumoral Progression and Therapy Resistance.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Minimally-invasive implantable device enhances brain cancer suppression.EMBO molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Identification and validation of COL6A1 as a novel target for tumor electric field therapy in glioblastoma.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Advanced tumor electric fields therapy: A review of innovative research and development and prospect of application in glioblastoma.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Review
- FBXO22 promotes glioblastoma malignant progression by mediating VHL ubiquitination and degradation.Cell death discovery · 2024Article
- Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Review
- Effect of Dimeric Disintegrins Isolated fromCancers · 2023Article
- Therapeutic potential of tumor treating fields for malignant brain tumors.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2023Review
- Design and Modeling of a Device Combining Single-Cell Exposure to a Uniform Electrical Field and Simultaneous Characterization via Bioimpedance Spectroscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- circMMD reduction following tumor treating fields inhibits glioblastoma progression through FUBP1/FIR/DVL1 and miR-15b-5p/FZD6 signaling.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTumor electric fields therapy (TTFields) is emerging as a novel anti-cancer physiotherapy. Despite recent breakthroughs of TTFields in glioma treatment, the average survival time for glioblastoma patients with TTFields is <2 years, even when used in conjugation with traditional anti-cancer therapies. To optimize TTFields-afforded efficacy against glioblastoma, we investigated the cancer cell-killing effects of various TTFields paradigms using in vitro and in vivo models of glioblastoma.
methodsFor in vitro studies, the U251 glioma cell line or primary cell cultures prepared from 20 glioblastoma patients were treated with the tumor electric field treatment (TEFT) system. Cell number, volume, and proliferation were measured after TEFT at different frequencies (100, 150, 180, 200, or 220 kHz), durations (24, 48, or 72 h), field strengths (1.0, 1.5, or 2.2V/cm), and output modes (fixed or random sequence output). A transwell system was used to evaluate the influence of TEFT on the invasiveness of primary glioblastoma cells. For in vivo studies, the therapeutic effect and safety profiles of random sequence electric field therapy in glioblastoma-transplanted rats were assessed by calculating tumor size and survival time and evaluating peripheral immunobiological and blood parameters, respectively.
resultsIn the in vitro settings, TEFT was robustly effective in suppressing cell proliferation of both the U251 glioma cell line and primary glioblastoma cell cultures. The anti-proliferation effects of TEFT were frequency- and "dose" (field strength and duration)-dependent, and contingent on the field sequence output mode, with the random sequence mode (TEFT-R) being more effective than the fixed sequence mode (TEFT-F). Genetic tests were performed in 11 of 20 primary glioblastoma cultures, and 6 different genetic traits were identified them. However, TEFT exhibited comparable anti-proliferation effects in all primary cultures regardless of their genetic traits. TEFT also inhibited the invasiveness of primary glioblastoma cells in transwell experiments. In the in vivo rat model of glioblastoma brain transplantation, treatment with TEFT-F or TEFT-R at frequency of 200 kHz and field strength of 2.2V/cm for 14 days significantly reduced tumor volume by 42.63% (TEFT-F vs. control, p = 0.0002) and 63.60% (TEFT-R vs. control, p < 0.0001), and prolonged animal survival time by 30.15% (TEFT-F vs. control, p = 0.0415) and 69.85% (TEFT-R vs. control, p = 0.0064), respectively. The tumor-bearing rats appeared to be well tolerable to TEFT therapies, showing only moderate increases in blood levels of creatine and red blood cells. Adverse skin reactions were common for TEFT-treated rats; however, skin reactions were curable by local treatment.
conclusionTumor electric field treatment at optimal frequency, strength, and output mode markedly inhibits the cell viability, proliferation, and invasiveness of primary glioblastoma cells in vitro independent of different genetic traits of the cells. Moreover, a random sequence electric field output confers considerable anti-cancer effects against glioblastoma in vivo. Thus, TTFields are a promising physiotherapy for glioblastoma and warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.