Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34710135›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Utilizing the SEIPS model to guide hand hygiene interventions at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia.

Leigh Berman, Meredith Kavalier, Beshea Gelana, Getnet Tesfaw, Dawd Siraj, Daniel Shirley, Daniel Yilma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Leigh BermanUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9248-9664
Meredith KavalierDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3274-2661
Beshea GelanaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-0457-846X
Getnet TesfawSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Dawd SirajDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Daniel ShirleyDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States of America.
Daniel YilmaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USJimma University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to apply the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model to increase effectiveness and sustainability of the World Health Organization's (WHOs) hand hygiene (HH) guidelines within healthcare systems. Our cross-sectional, mixed-methods study took place at Jimma University Medical Center (JUMC), a tertiary care hospital in Jimma, Ethiopia, between November 2018 and August 2020 and consisted of three phases: baseline assessment, intervention, and follow-up assessment. We conducted questionnaires addressing HH knowledge and attitudes, interviews to identify HH barriers and facilitators within the SEIPS framework, and observations at the WHO's 5 moments of HH amongst healthcare workers (HCWs) at JUMC. We then implemented HH interventions based on WHO guidelines and results from our baseline assessment. Follow-up HH observations were conducted months later during the Covid-19 pandemic. 250 HCWs completed questionnaires with an average knowledge score of 61.4% and attitude scores indicating agreement that HH promotes patient safety. Interview participants cited multiple barriers to HH including shortages and location of HH materials, inadequate training, minimal Infection Prevention Control team presence, and high workload. We found an overall baseline HH compliance rate of 9.4% and a follow-up compliance rate of 72.1%. Drastically higher follow-up compared to baseline compliance rates were likely impacted by our HH interventions and Covid-19. HCWs showed motivation for patient safety despite low HH knowledge. Utilizing the SEIPS model helped identify institution-specific barriers that informed targeted interventions beyond WHO guidelines aimed at increasing effectiveness and sustainability of HH efforts.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19Cross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleGuideline AdherenceHand DisinfectionHand HygieneHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansInfection ControlMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34710135
PMCPMC8553035
OpenAlexW3208739576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.