Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34710126›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Extent of compliance with COVID-19 prevention and control guidelines among supermarkets in Kampala Capital City and Mukono Municipality, Uganda.

Richard K Mugambe, Tonny Ssekamatte, Stevens Kisaka, Solomon T Wafula, John Bosco Isunju, Aisha Nalugya, Patience Oputan, Douglas Kizito Makanga, Michael Mukiibi, Esther Buregyeya and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Richard K MugambeMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-2311-5436
Tonny SsekamatteMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-8127-6759
Stevens KisakaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Solomon T WafulaMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-6405-015X
John Bosco IsunjuMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Aisha NalugyaMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Patience OputanMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Douglas Kizito MakangaMinistry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Michael MukiibiWorld Health Organisation, Kampala, Uganda.
Esther BuregyeyaMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Simon KasasaMinistry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Winnifred K KansiimeMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Julie BalenSchool of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4736-8465
Renuka KapoorThe Center for Global Safe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene. Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6609-4175
Joanne A McGriffThe Center for Global Safe Water, Sanitation and Hygiene. Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the development and enforcement of preventive guidelines by governments, COVID-19 continues to spread across nations, causing unprecedented economic losses and mortality. Public places remain hotspots for COVID-19 transmission due to large numbers of people present; however preventive measures are poorly enforced. Supermarkets are among the high-risk establishments due to the high interactions involved, which makes compliance with the COVID-19 preventive guidelines of paramount importance. However, until now, there has been limited evidence on compliance with the set COVID-19 prevention guidelines. Therefore, this study aimed to measure compliance with the COVID-19 prevention guidelines among supermarkets in Kampala Capital City and Mukono Municipality Uganda.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among selected supermarkets in Kampala Capital City and Mukono Municipality in September 2020. A total of 229 supermarkets (195 in Kampala City and 34 in Mukono Municipality) were randomly selected for the study. Data were collected through structured observations on the status of compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines, and entered using the KoboCollect software, which was preinstalled on mobile devices (smart phones and tablets). Descriptive statistics were generated to measure compliance to the set COVID-19 Ministry of Health prevention guidelines using Stata 14 software.

resultsOnly 16.6% (38/229) of the supermarkets complied with the COVID-19 prevention and control guidelines. In line with the specific measures, almost all supermarkets 95.2% (218/229) had hand washing facilities placed at strategic points such as the entrance, and 59.8% (137/229) of the supermarkets surveyed regularly disinfected commonly touched surfaces. Only 40.6% and 30.6% of the supermarkets enforced mandatory hand washing and use of face masks respectively for all customers accessing the premises. Slightly more than half, 52.4% (120/229) of the supermarkets had someone or a team in charge of enforcing compliance to COVID-19 measures and more than half, 55.5% (127/229) of the supermarkets had not provided their staff with job-specific training/mentorship on infection prevention and control for COVID-19. Less than a third, 26.2% (60/229) of the supermarkets had an infrared temperature gun for screening every customer, and only 5.7% (13/229) of the supermarkets captured details of clients accessing the supermarket as a measure to ease follow-up.

conclusionThis study revealed low compliance with COVID-19 guidelines, which required mandatory preventive measures such as face masking, regular disinfection, social distancing, and hand hygiene. This study suggests the need for health authorities to strengthen enforcement of these guidelines, and to sensitise the supermarket managers on COVID-19 in order to increase the uptake of the different measures.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFood MarketsGuideline AdherenceHand DisinfectionHand HygieneHumansMasksPhysical DistancingPublic PolicySARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUganda

Identifiers

PMID34710126
PMCPMC8553093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.