ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022
An Effective Preprocessing Method for High-Quality Pan-Genome Analysis of Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hidden in the Pangenome? Machine Learning-Driven Discovery of Antimicrobial Potential inBioinformatics and biology insights · 2026Article
- The pangenome: a statistical model, not a fixed biological property.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Review
- Benchmarking pangenome dynamics and horizontal gene transfer inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Unveiling intraspecific diversity and evolutionary dynamics of the foodborne pathogenCurrent research in food science · 2024Article
- Pangenome analysis of Enterobacteria reveals richness of secondary metabolite gene clusters and their associated gene sets.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli, as widely used microbial species, are of great significance in studying microbial community relationships, adaptive evolution in various niches, engineering cell factories that produce specific products, and designing genome reduction. The pan-genome analysis is an effective method for studying the characteristics and functions of genes among and within species. Many research directions and conclusions usually depend on accurate gene identification and reliable pan-genome results. However, there currently lack enough studies showing how to achieve high-quality pan-genome results between or within certain species. This chapter will take Bacillus subtilis as an example to introduce a stepwise manner for improving the quality of the pan-genome by gradually removing confounding strains step-by-step, and ultimately obtaining a reliable high-quality pan-genome landscape of Bacillus subtilis, which could be used as a quality control protocol in pan-genome analysis pipeline. Finally, we suggest further improving the pan-genome analysis results of Escherichia coli to prove the feasibility and credibility of the quality control protocol for obtaining high-quality pan-genome landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34709628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.