Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34709559›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2022

Patient-reported outcome measures in Arabic-speaking populations: a systematic review.

Sinaa Alaqeel, Almaha Alfakhri, Zakiyah Alkherb, Nouf Almeshal

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Budget impact analysis of baricitinib for treatment of alopecia areata: A Saudi hospital perspective.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Methodological quality of 100 recent systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments: an overview of reviews.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sinaa AlaqeelClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. salageel@ksu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0571-7230
Almaha AlfakhriClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Zakiyah AlkherbClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nouf AlmeshalClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SA

Funding

King Saud University (URSP-3-17-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis research aimed, first, to identify, summarize, and synthesize the studies reporting the development, translation, and/or psychometric evaluation of PROMs in Arabic-speaking populations and, second, to evaluate the psychometric properties and the translation process of a sample 26 PROMs.

methodsIn 2019, PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS were searched for studies reporting the development, translation, or cross-cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures in Arabic-speaking populations, and those including the assessment of one or more psychometric properties as PROMs (including validity, reliability, responsiveness, interpretability) in our target populations were included. The review protocol registration number is CRD42018088991.

resultsThe search strategy outlined above yielded a total of 3179 titles in the three databases. Of these, 174 English language studies met the inclusion criteria. One hundred thirty-six PROMs were identified. The methodological quality and translation process of PROMs reported by at least two studies (26 PROM instruments, 63 studies) were examined. Internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity were the most frequently reported psychometric properties. Structural validity, cross-cultural validity, responsiveness, and measurement error were largely unreported. The process of developing at least two independent forward translations and back translation of the instrument into the source language were reported by 32 and 43 studies, respectively.

conclusionThere is a need for further investigation of measurement properties of Arabic PROMs measures before routine use can be recommended in clinical practice.

Indexed as

LanguageQuality of LifeHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesArabsHealth-related quality of lifeMeasurement propertiesPatient-reported outcome measuresSurveys and questionnairesTranslations

Identifiers

PMID34709559
OpenAlexW3209590222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.