ArticleThe protein journal2021
Structure Analysis of Proteins and Peptides by Difference Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy.
Article in The protein journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lessons learned from allergen adsorption on engineered nanomaterials: bridging experimental insights and computational technologies.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Differences and Similarities in Protein and Nucleic Acid Structures and Their Biological Interactions.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Enhancing the Conformational Stability of the cl-Par-4 Tumor Suppressor via Site-Directed Mutagenesis.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Investigating Chaperone like Activity of Green Silver Nanoparticles: Possible Implications in Drug Development.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Difference circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy was used here to characterize changes in structure of flexible peptides upon altering their environments. Environmental changes were introduced by binding to a large target structure, temperature shift (or concentration increase) or so-called membrane-mimicking solvents. The first case involved binding of a largely disordered peptide to its target structure associated with chromatin remodeling, leading to a transition into a highly helical structure. The second example was a short 8HD (His-Asp) repeat peptide that can bind metal ions. Both Zn and Ni at μM concentrations resulted in different type of changes in secondary structure, suggesting that these metal ions provide different environments for the peptide to assume unique secondary structures. The third case is related to a few short neuroprotective peptides that were largely disordered in aqueous solution. Increased temperature resulted in induction of significant, though small, β-sheet structures. Last example was the induction of non-helical structures for short neuroprotective peptides by membrane-mimicking solvents, including trifluoroethanol, dodecylphosphocholine and sodium dodecylsulfate. While these agents are known to induce α-helix, none of the neuropeptides underwent transition to a typical helical structure. However, trifluoroethanol did induce α-helix for the first peptide involved in chromatin remodeling described above in the first example.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.