ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2023
[Availability of patient information in the emergency department : Wish and reality].
Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated Filtering and Visualization of Patient-Centered Data from Electronic Health Records in Emergency Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Role and relevance of dentists in a multiprofessional palliative care team: results of a cross-sectional survey study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFast access to information from other healthcare service providers is particularly important in emergency medicine, as the patients are often unknown and treatment decisions have to be made promptly.
objectivesThe study aims to identify the challenges that emergency departments face in obtaining information on patient history, the expected benefits of easier access to information and which information is most urgently needed. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn online survey throughout Germany was carried out among medical staff working in emergency departments. In all, 181 questionnaires were fully completed and could be included in the data analysis.
resultsOf the respondents, 77.9% said it was difficult or very difficult to receive external data at the point of patient care. The survey participants estimate that they need an average of around 47 min to obtain information about one patient. 99.4% believe that patient care would benefit from an easier and faster information exchange. Medication lists, discharge letters, information on previous illnesses and allergies were classified as the most important data elements.
conclusionsThere is an urgent need for action with regard to the considerable effort involved in obtaining information on emergency patients. Digital solutions such as the recently introduced emergency data set can offer additional value for clinical emergency care if they are widely used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.