Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34709426›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2022

[The way to routine data from 16 emergency departments for cross-sectoral health services research : Experiences, challenges and solution approaches from the extraction of pseudonymous data for the INDEED project].

Antje Fischer-Rosinský, Anna Slagman, Ryan King, Grit Zimmermann, Johannes Drepper, Dominik Brammen, Christian Lüpkes, Thomas Reinhold, Stephanie Roll, Thomas Keil and 3 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. [The impact of primary data quality and interoperability on the analysis of real-world data].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Antje Fischer-RosinskýNotfall- und Akutmedizin (Campus Mitte und Virchow-Klinikum), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland. antje.fischer-rosinsky@charite.de.
Anna SlagmanNotfall- und Akutmedizin (Campus Mitte und Virchow-Klinikum), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Ryan KingInstitut für Sozialmedizin, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Grit ZimmermannTMF - Technologie- und Methodenplattform für vernetzte medizinische Forschung e. V., Berlin, Deutschland.
Johannes DrepperTMF - Technologie- und Methodenplattform für vernetzte medizinische Forschung e. V., Berlin, Deutschland.
Dominik BrammenUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
Christian LüpkesOFFIS - Institut für Informatik, Oldenburg, Deutschland.
Thomas ReinholdInstitut für Sozialmedizin, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Stephanie RollInstitut für Sozialmedizin, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Thomas KeilInstitut für Sozialmedizin, Epidemiologie und Gesundheitsökonomie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
Martin MöckelNotfall- und Akutmedizin (Campus Mitte und Virchow-Klinikum), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Felix GreinerUniversitätsklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
INDEED-Projekt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany there is currently no health reporting on cross-sectoral care patterns in the context of an emergency department care treatment. The INDEED project (Utilization and trans-sectoral patterns of care for patients admitted to emergency departments in Germany) collects routine data from 16 emergency departments, which are later merged with outpatient billing data from 2014 to 2017 on an individual level.

aimThe methodological challenges in planning of the internal merging of routine clinical and administrative data from emergency departments in Germany up to the final data extraction are presented together with possible solution approaches.

methodsData were selected in an iterative process according to the research questions, medical relevance, and assumed data availability. After a preparatory phase to clarify formalities (including data protection, ethics), review test data and correct if necessary, the encrypted and pseudonymous data extraction was performed.

resultsData from the 16 cooperating emergency departments came mostly from the emergency department and hospital information systems. There was considerable heterogeneity in the data. Not all variables were available in every emergency department because, for example, they were not standardized and digitally available or the extraction effort was judged to be too high.

conclusionRelevant data from emergency departments are stored in different structures and in several IT systems. Thus, the creation of a harmonized data set requires considerable resources on the part of the hospital as well as the data processing unit. This needs to be generously calculated for future projects.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalGermanyHealth Services ResearchHospitalizationHumansData integrationDocumentationEmergency careSecondary dataStandardization

Identifiers

PMID34709426
PMCPMC9633500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.