Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34709394›Full record

ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2021

Development of next generation nanomedicine-based approaches for the treatment of cancer: we've barely scratched the surface.

Shannon R Tracey, Peter Smyth, Caroline J Barelle, Christopher J Scott

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Peptide-coated DNA nanostructures as a platform for control of lysosomal function in cells.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shannon R TraceyThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, U.K.
Peter SmythThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, U.K.
Caroline J BarelleElasmogen Ltd, Liberty Building, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen AB25 2ZP, U.K.
Christopher J ScottThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-7582-3808

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R009112/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in nanomedicines has grown rapidly over the past two decades, owing to the promising therapeutic applications they may provide, particularly for the treatment of cancer. Personalised medicine and 'smart' actively targeted nanoparticles represent an opportunity to deliver therapies directly to cancer cells and provide sustained drug release, in turn providing overall lower off-target toxicity and increased therapeutic efficacy. However, the successful translation of nanomedicines from encouraging pre-clinical findings to the clinic has, to date, proven arduous. In this review, we will discuss the use of nanomedicines for the treatment of cancer, with a specific focus on the use of polymeric and lipid nanoparticle delivery systems. In particular, we examine approaches exploring the surface functionalisation of nanomedicines to elicit active targeting and therapeutic effects as well as challenges and future directions for nanoparticles in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

NanomedicineAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agentscancerconjugationdrug deliverynanomedicinesurface functionalisationtargeted therapeutics

Identifiers

PMID34709394
PMCPMC8589425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.