Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34709179›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2021

Implementation, Adoption, and Perceptions of Telemental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review.

Rebecca Appleton, Julie Williams, Norha Vera San Juan, Justin J Needle, Merle Schlief, Harriet Jordan, Luke Sheridan Rains, Lucy Goulding, Monika Badhan, Emily Roxburgh and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
25.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 188 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca Appleton *NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4097-3512
Julie Williams *Centre for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8861-0596
Norha Vera San Juan *NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8677-7341
Justin J NeedleCentre for Health Services Research, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0727-1391
Merle SchliefNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3744-6260
Harriet JordanCentre for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7268-7310
Luke Sheridan RainsNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4905-4168
Lucy GouldingKing's Improvement Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5074-7071
Monika BadhanCamden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6459-2194
Emily RoxburghKingston iCope, Camden & Islington NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8676-1297
Phoebe BarnettNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6521-3101
Spyros SpyridonidisNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4864-3438
Magdalena TomaskovaNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8053-8307
Jiping MoNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8315-7967
Jasmine Harju-SeppänenDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9027-2119
Zoë HaimeDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6599-2176
Cecilia CasettaDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1980-3415
Alexandra PapamichailNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8589-6648
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9866-788X
Alan SimpsonNIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3286-9846
Nick SevdalisCentre for Implementation Science, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7560-8924
Fiona Gaughran *Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7414-5569
Sonia Johnson *NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2219-1384
King's College London · GBMental Health Research UK · GBCamden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBCity, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly in 2020, mental health services had to rapidly shift from face-to-face models of care to delivering the majority of treatments remotely (by video or phone call or occasionally messaging) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This resulted in several challenges for staff and patients, but also in benefits such as convenience or increased access for people with impaired mobility or in rural areas. There is a need to understand the extent and impacts of telemental health implementation, and barriers and facilitators to its effective and acceptable use. This is relevant both to future emergency adoption of telemental health and to debates on its future use in routine mental health care.

objectiveTo investigate the adoption and impacts of telemental health approaches during the COVID-19 pandemic, and facilitators and barriers to optimal implementation.

methodsFour databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science) were searched for primary research relating to remote working, mental health care, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Preprint servers were also searched. Results of studies were synthesized using framework synthesis.

resultsA total of 77 papers met our inclusion criteria. In most studies, the majority of contacts could be transferred to a remote form during the pandemic, and good acceptability to service users and clinicians tended to be reported, at least where the alternative to remote contacts was interrupting care. However, a range of impediments to dealing optimal care by this means were also identified.

conclusionsImplementation of telemental health allowed some continuing support to the majority of service users during the COVID-19 pandemic and has value in an emergency situation. However, not all service users can be reached by this means, and better evidence is now needed on long-term impacts on therapeutic relationships and quality of care, and on impacts on groups at risk of digital exclusion and how to mitigate these.

trial registrationPROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews CRD42021211025; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021211025.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19mental healthremote caresystematic review, implementation sciencetelemedicinetelemental health

Identifiers

PMID34709179
PMCPMC8664153
OpenAlexW3209734246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.