Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34709136›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2021

Molecular characterization, receptor binding property, and replication in chickens and mice of H9N2 avian influenza viruses isolated from chickens, peafowls, and wild birds in eastern China.

Jing Guo, Yanwen Wang, Conghui Zhao, Xinxin Gao, Yaping Zhang, Jiqing Li, Mengjing Wang, Hong Zhang, Wenqiang Liu, Chao Wang and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jing GuoCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Yanwen WangCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Conghui ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Xinxin GaoCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Yaping ZhangState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Jiqing LiState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Mengjing WangCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Hong ZhangCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Wenqiang LiuCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5028-0467
Chao WangCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Yingju XiaNational Classical Swine Fever Reference Laboratory, China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lu XuNational Classical Swine Fever Reference Laboratory, China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Guimei HeInstitute of Eco-Chongming (IEC), East China Normal University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jinyan ShenCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Xiaohong SunCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Wenting WangCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Xinyu HanCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoxuan ZhangCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Zhengyang HouCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Xinlin JinCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Na PengCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Yubao LiCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.
Guohua DengState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Pengfei CuiState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Qianyi ZhangNational Classical Swine Fever Reference Laboratory, China Institute of Veterinary Drug Control, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xuyong LiCollege of Agronomy, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4349-3960
Hualan ChenState Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Liaocheng University · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNChina Institute of Veterinary Drug Control · CNEast China Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

H9N2 avian influenza viruses are widely prevalent in birds and pose an increasing threat to humans because of their enhanced virulence and transmissibility in mammals. Active surveillance on the prevalence and evolution of H9N2 viruses in different avian hosts will help develop eradication measures. We isolated 16 H9N2 viruses from chickens, green peafowls, and wild birds in eastern China from 2017 to 2019 and characterized their comparative genetic evolution, receptor-binding specificity, antigenic diversity, replication, and transmission in chickens and mice. The phylogenetic analysis indicated that the green peafowl viruses and swan reassortant shared the same ancestor with the poultry H9N2 viruses prevalent in eastern China, while the seven wild bird viruses belonged to wild bird lineage. The chicken, peafowl, and swan H9N2 viruses that belonged to the poultry lineage preferentially recognized α-2, 6-linked sialic acids (human-like receptor), but the wild bird lineage viruses can bind both α-2, 3 (avian-like receptor) and human-like receptor similarly. Interestingly, the H9N2 viruses of poultry lineage replicated well and transmitted efficiently, but the viruses of wild bird lineage replicated and transmitted with low efficiency. Importantly, the H9N2 viruses of poultry lineage replicated in higher titer in mammal cells and mice than the viruses of wild birds lineage. Altogether, our study indicates that co-circulation of the H9N2 viruses in poultry, wild birds, and ornamental birds increased their cross-transmission risk in different birds because of their widespread dissemination.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationAnimalsAnimals, WildBirdsChickensChinaHumansInfluenza A Virus, H9N2 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsMicePhylogenyPoultry DiseasesReceptors, VirusReceptors, VirusAvian influenza viruschickenH9N2peafowlwild birds

Identifiers

PMID34709136
PMCPMC8592596
OpenAlexW3209002249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.