Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34708780›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021

Comparison of broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in eyes of patients with diabetes with no diabetic retinopathy and different stages of diabetic retinopathy.

Aniruddha Banerjee, Karthika Pandurangan, Amose Joe, Ramya Sachidanandam, Parveen Sen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aniruddha BanerjeeDepartment of Optometry; Department of Vitreo-Retinal Services, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Karthika PanduranganDepartment of Optometry, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Amose JoeDepartment of Optometry; Department of Vitreo-Retinal Services, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ramya SachidanandamDepartment of Optometry; Department of Vitreo-Retinal Services, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Parveen SenDepartment of Vitreo-Retinal Services, Medical Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sankara Nethralaya · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the change in broadband (W/W), red on blue (R/B), and blue on yellow (B/Y) photopic negative response (PhNR) in patients with diabetes mellitus with no diabetic retinopathy (no DR) and different stages of DR and compare it with age-matched controls. This study was performed to provide a single PhNR protocol that can be used for early diagnosis of DR.

methodsIt was a cross-sectional case-control study done in a hospital setup. Patients with diabetes with no DR and different stages of DR with no other associated ocular pathologies were included. Age-matched controls with no retinal pathologies were also included for comparison. All subjects underwent detailed ophthalmic examination and W/W, R/B, and B/Y electroretinography. Fifty control eyes and 52 treatment naïve eyes of 52 patients with diabetes [no DR = 11, mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) =11, moderate NPDR = 10, severe NPDR = 9, and proliferative DR = 11] were included in the study.

resultsOn comparing the ERG responses in patients with diabetes and age-matched controls, a significant reduction (P < 0.05) was noted in the amplitudes of a-wave (39.78 ± 11.34 μV vs. 67.28 ± 12.88 μV), b-wave (116.25 ± 45.25 vs. 134.39 ± 28.78 μV), W/W PhNR (33.86 ± 17.33 vs. 67.18 ± 15.99 μV), R/B PhNR (28.77 ± 15.85 vs. 53.48 ± 14.15 μV), and B/Y PhNR (55.04 ± 32.63 vs. 104.79 ± 24.37 μV). Post hoc analysis revealed that all the eyes in the diabetic group, including those with no DR, had a significantly reduced PhNR amplitude (P < 0.05) when compared with controls. PhNR was found to reduce in amplitude with increasing severity of DR (P < 0.05), with more significance in B/Y. Receiver operating characteristic showed highest area under the curve in B/Y PhNR (94%, P < 0.001), with maximum sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 87%, respectively.

conclusionChanges in the amplitude and implicit time of ERG can reflect the severity of DR. PhNR amplitudes, especially B/Y PhNR, appear to be significantly reduced even in eyes with no DR.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesElectroretinographyHumansRetinal Ganglion CellsDiabetic retinopathyelectroretinographyretinal ganglion cell

Identifiers

PMID34708780
PMCPMC8725145
OpenAlexW3209104312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.