ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2021
Validation of choroidal hyperreflective foci in diabetic macular edema through a retrospective pilot study.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Choroidal Vascular Remodeling After Loading Injections of Faricimab in Diabetic Macular Edema.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Hyperreflective Choroidal Foci: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2025Review
- Spatial Distribution of Hyperreflective Choroidal Foci in the Macula of Normal Eyes.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Commentary: Hyperreflective foci on optical coherence tomography and their clinical implications in diabetic macular edema.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChoroidal hyperreflective foci (HCF) are novel spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT) biomarkers in diabetic macular edema (DME). The present study intended to validate HCF and assess their role in the treatment outcome.
methodsIt was a retrospective, longitudinal, records-based pilot study recruiting consecutive patients of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy with treatment naïve DME. Patients were treated with three intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections and followed by a pro re nata regimen.
resultsA total of 43 eyes of 28 patients were included in the study. Eyes were divided into two groups. Group A (n = 19) comprised eyes with retinal hyperreflective foci (HRF) and group B (n = 24) had eyes with both HRF and HCF. The mean age of patients in group A and B was 58.5 ± 2.1 years and 55.2 ± 8.8 years, respectively. Mean best-corrected visual acuity at presentation was 0.38 ± 0.25 in group A and 0.59 ± 0.29 in group B (P = 0.01). Final BCVA was 0.35 ± 0.39 in group A and 0.47 ± 0.34 in group B (P = 0.3). External limiting membrane was intact in 19 out of 19 eyes in group A and two (8.3%) eyes in group B (P = 0).
conclusionPresence of HCF meant significantly worse initial BCVA compared to the eye that had HRF alone. The final BCVA was also worse in eyes with HCF compared to those with HRF and without HCF; however, the difference did not reach a significance level, probably pointing toward the fact that HCF and HRF are pathophysiologically identical. Further studies with a larger sample size and prospective design are needed to take these findings forward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.