Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34708554›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology2022

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization with medium-sized versus small-sized CalliSpheres microspheres in unresectable primary liver cancer.

Jiao Zhang, Guo-An Feng, Yuliang Li, Wujie Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiao ZhangDepartment of Health Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Guo-An FengDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Juye County People' Hospital, Heze, Shandong Province, China.
Yuliang LiDepartment of Interventional Medicine, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Interventional Oncology Institute of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Wujie WangDepartment of Interventional Medicine, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Interventional Oncology Institute of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9431-7153
Second Hospital of Shandong University · CNShandong Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

Key Research & Development Plan of Shandong Province 2019GSF108105National Natural Science Foundation of China 11971269Shandong Provincial Department of Finance S190009280000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe optimal microparticle size for drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) remains unknown. This retrospective cohort study analyzed the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres microsphere embolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to determine the influence of particle size on the results. PATIENTS AND

methodsForty-two patients with unresectable HCC were enrolled in this retrospective study from January 2018 to January 2020. Patients received DEB-TACE with CalliSpheres of 100-300 μm (small-size, n = 15) or 300-500 μm (medium-size, n = 27). The tumor response was evaluated via enhanced CT or MRI at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after treatment, based on the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adverse events after DEB-TACE were recorded.

resultsComplete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were recorded in 20%, 20%, 33.3%, 26.7%, respectively, of patients in the small-size group and 3.7%, 25.9%, 44.4%, 25.9% of patients in the medium-size group, respectively. No significant difference was found between the two groups (p = 0.516). Major adverse events, including grade three liver toxicity (n = 4) and liver abscess (n = 3), occurred significantly more in the small-size group, while none were reported in the medium size group (p < 0.05).

conclusionDEB-TACE with medium-size (300-500 μm) CalliSpheres microspheres had similar efficacy and a better safety profile than DEB-TACE with small-size (100-300 μm) CalliSpheres, indicating that medium-size microspheres may be a better choice for unresectable primary liver cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsDoxorubicinHumansMicrospheresRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDoxorubicinchemoembolizationliver cancermicrospheressizeunresectable

Identifiers

PMID34708554
PMCPMC9543937
OpenAlexW3209050153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.