Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34708443›Full record

SynthesisIndoor air2022

Occupational scenarios and exposure assessment to formaldehyde: A systematic review.

Vittoria Cammalleri, Roberta Noemi Pocino, Daniela Marotta, Carmela Protano, Federica Sinibaldi, Stefano Simonazzi, Marta Petyx, Sergio Iavicoli, Matteo Vitali

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Indoor air, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Leukemia Incidence by Occupation and Industry: A Cohort Study of 2.3 Million Workers from Ontario, Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vittoria CammalleriDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Roberta Noemi PocinoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Daniela MarottaDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Carmela ProtanoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Federica SinibaldiDepartment of Anatomical Histological Medical Legal Sciences and Locomotor Apparatus, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Stefano SimonazziDepartment of Anatomical Histological Medical Legal Sciences and Locomotor Apparatus, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Marta PetyxDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL Research, Rome, Italy.
Sergio IavicoliDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, INAIL Research, Rome, Italy.
Matteo VitaliDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1001-6343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of the systematic review were to: identify the work sectors at risk for exposure to formaldehyde; investigate the procedures applied to assess occupational exposure; evaluate the reported exposure levels among the different settings. An electronic search of Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and ToxNet was carried out for collecting all the articles on the investigated issue published from January 1, 2004 to September 30, 2019. Forty-three papers were included in the review, and evidenced a great number of occupational scenarios at risk for formaldehyde exposure. All the included studies collected data on formaldehyde exposure levels by a similar approach: environmental and personal sampling followed by chromatographic analyses. Results ranged from not detectable values until to some mg m

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorOccupational ExposureRespiratory HypersensitivityFormaldehydeHumansLaboratoriesFormaldehydeanalytical approachexposure assessmentexposure levelsformaldehydeoccupational settings

Identifiers

PMID34708443
PMCPMC9298394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.