Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34708254›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2022

A naturalistic study of orally administered vs. inhaled legal market cannabis: cannabinoids exposure, intoxication, and impairment.

L Cinnamon Bidwell, Hollis C Karoly, Marco Ortiz Torres, Ashley Master, Angela D Bryan, Kent E Hutchison

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L Cinnamon BidwellInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA. lcb@colorado.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6762-7586
Hollis C KarolyInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Marco Ortiz TorresInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Ashley MasterDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Angela D BryanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Kent E HutchisonDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Boulder · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Rocky Mountain Cannabis Research CenterP50DA056408 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KENT E. HUTCHISON · 2023 to 2026
$14.0M
Marijuana Harm Reduction: Innovative Strategies for Developing New KnowledgeR01DA039707 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HUTCHISON, KENT E. · 2016 to 2020
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA056408NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA039707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePublished studies examining the effects of cannabis have largely utilized forms of cannabis that are not representative of the legal market products currently available.

objectivesThe present study aimed to characterize naturalistic use of legal market flower and edible products by examining associations among blood cannabinoids and amount of THC consumed as well as physiological, cognitive, and subjective effects in users of edible and flower forms.

methodEighty-four participants who used cannabis at least 1 × /week (55 flower cannabis using participants; 29 edible cannabis using participants mean age = 31.95 years, 44% female) participated. At the experimental appointment in our mobile laboratory, participants completed a blood draw to assess plasma cannabinoids, measures of heart rate, subjective drug effects, and cognition both before and after ad libitum use of legal market flower or edible cannabis.

resultsAverage self-reported THC consumed was 15.97 mg (SD = 22.40) in edible users and 51.25 mg (SD = 45.23) in flower users. In the edible group, but not the flower group, strong correlations emerged between self-reported ad libitum THC consumed and plasma THC. Plasma THC was significantly higher after use of inhaled cannabis, but similar levels of plasma THC metabolites and similar levels of subjective intoxication and verbal memory impairment were observed in both flower and edible users.

conclusionsFindings support strong correlations among ad libitum THC consumed and THC plasma levels after edible cannabis use and suggest few differences in intoxication and impairment between edible and flower cannabis users after ad libitum use. This novel study provides important preliminary data on the pharmacology and effects of legal market edible cannabis.

Indexed as

CannabinoidsCannabisHallucinogensMarijuana SmokingAdultCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDronabinolFemaleHumansMaleCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCannabinoidsDronabinolHallucinogensCannabinoidsCBDDrug rewardEdiblesMarijuanaTHC

Identifiers

PMID34708254
PMCPMC12238766
OpenAlexW3210843480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.