Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34708220›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of transgender health2021

Normal parents: Trans pregnancy and the production of reproducers.

Elizabeth Dietz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of transgender health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reconceiving Reproductive Health Systems: Caring for Trans, Nonbinary, and Gender-Expansive People During Pregnancy and Childbirth.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth DietzThe School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Arizona State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome trans people want to create families in a variety of ways that include pregnancy, but often face obstacles in doing so.

aimsThis paper explores how trans pregnancy is treated as exceptional and out of the ordinary by reproductive institutions.

methodsAnalysis of case studies demonstrates the ubiquity of institutional obstacles to trans pregnancy and how reproductive institutions unnecessarily render trans pregnancy exceptional.

resultsReproductive institutions shape the kinds of people for whom achieving pregnancy is made easier, and often fail to imagine the possibility of trans parents. This failure of imagination is not rooted in biological fact, but rather in social logics that ought to be the site for transformations that expand access and shift provider attitudes. DISCUSSION: Trans parents are unexceptional in the sense that, even though they may experience relatively more concentrated forms of adversity, they share many reproductive capabilities and obstacles with cis parents. In light of that concentrated adversity and the epistemic insights it might generate, how might prospective trans parents engage with new reproductive technologies? How might these engagements render them moral pioneers called to make decisions about the sorts of people created using reproductive biotechnologies?

Indexed as

Bioethicsreproductive technologiestransgendertrans pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34708220
PMCPMC8040689
OpenAlexW3097766756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.