Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34708212›Full record

ArticleCollaborations (Coral Gables, Fla.)2020

Power Sharing, Capacity Building, and Evolving Roles in ELSI: The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research.

Jessica Blanchard, Vanessa Hiratsuka, Julie A Beans, Justin Lund, Bobby Saunkeah, Joseph Yracheta, R Brian Woodbury, Erika Blacksher, Michael Peercy, Scott Ketchum and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Collaborations (Coral Gables, Fla.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring Genetic Counselors' Experiences with Indigenous Patient Populations.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ready, Set, Sort! A User-Guide to Card Sorts for Community-Engaged Empirical Bioethics.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Rethinking the "Public" and Rethinking "Engagement".The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jessica BlanchardUniversity of Oklahoma, US.
Vanessa HiratsukaSouthcentral Foundation, US.
Julie A BeansSouthcentral Foundation, US.
Justin LundUniversity of Oklahoma, US.
Bobby SaunkeahChickasaw Nation, US.
Joseph YrachetaMissouri Breaks Industries Research, Inc, US.
R Brian WoodburySouthcentral Foundation, US.
Erika BlacksherUniversity of Washington, US.
Michael PeercyChickasaw Nation, US.
Scott KetchumEast Central University, US.
Christie ByarsChickasaw Nation, US.
Paul SpicerUniversity of Oklahoma, US.

Funding

Trust and Mistrust in American Indian and Alaska Native CommunitiesRM1HG009042 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI SPICER, PAUL G · 2016 to 2024
$8.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS RM1 HG009042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent, unresolved issues stemming from a legacy of scientific exploitation and bio-colonialism have kept many tribal nations from participating in genomic research. The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research (CEIGR) aims to model meaningful community engagement that moves toward more inclusive and equitable research practices related to genomics. This article reflects on key successes and challenges behind CEIGR's efforts to shape Ethical, Legal and Social Implications (ELSI) research in ways that are informed by Indigenous perspectives, to locate community partnerships at the center of genomics research, and to conduct normative and empirical research with Indigenous communities that is grounded in the concepts of reciprocity, transparency and cultural competency. The structure of CEIGR represents an important shift away from a traditional model centered on a university-based principal investigators toward a partner-centered research approach that emphasizes equity and community control by distributing power and decision-making across all CEIGR partner sites. We discuss three features of CEIGR that have contributed to this shift towards an equitable, community-driven partnership: 1) balancing local priorities with collective goals; 2) distributing power in ways that promote equitable partnerships; and 3) capacity building and co-learning across partner sites. The discussion of these three areas in this article speaks to a particular strength of our Center: the interdependence among partners and collective willingness to maintain a plasticity of leadership that creates space for all of our partners to lead, support, exchange and strengthen ELSI research.

Indexed as

American Indian/Alaska Nativecommunity-based participatory researchcommunity engagementELSIgenomics

Identifiers

PMID34708212
PMCPMC8547310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.