Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34708202›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2021

High-Dose Neuromodulators: A Roundtable on Making Sense of the Data in Real-World Clinical Practice.

Sabrina Guillen Fabi, Jean Carruthers, John Joseph, Sue Ellen Cox, Steve Yoelin, Julius Few, Joely Kaufman-Janette, Steven Dayan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Consensus Statement on the Use of Botulinum Neurotoxin in the Middle East.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023
    Article
  6. Important Considerations in the High-Dose Toxins Discussion.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sabrina Guillen FabiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jean CarruthersDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
John JosephClinical Testing of Beverly Hills, Encino, CA, USA.
Sue Ellen CoxUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Steve YoelinDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Julius FewUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joely Kaufman-JanetteDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Steven DayanDivision of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor aesthetic treatment with botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNTA), interest in maximizing treatment duration and efficacy has prompted study of doses higher than those used in registration studies. As data emerge, it is important that physicians understand how to apply study findings to their own practice so that patient demand is satisfied.

objectivesTo bring together leading experts in neuromodulators for a roundtable discussion on the implications of high-dose BoNTA studies for patient care.

methodsThe authors reviewed and discussed recent data from high-dose BoNTA studies for abobotulinum toxin A, incobotulinum toxin A, and Oonobotulinumtoxin A.

resultsDiscussion focused on the challenges of data interpretation and extrapolation of study findings for real-world patient care. The authors participated in a candid discussion of whether the observed improvements in treatment duration and patient satisfaction warrant treatment with high-dose regimens delivered as high-concentration injections. Safety was also discussed, as well as economic considerations for both practices and patients. Of note, for BoNTA products, the registration dose, when administered in a smaller total volume, appears to give rise to more durable results than those observed in pivotal trials, implicating product concentration as an important consideration. Importantly, at higher doses, extended duration of effect does not appear to be at the expense of natural-looking results.

conclusionsWhile the authors provide considerations for the development of individual clinical practice, there is no one-size-fits-all recommendation. It may be that "high-dose" BoNTA is in reality the optimal dose; however, important economic considerations may prevent rapid uptake for all patients.

Identifiers

PMID34708202
PMCPMC8545706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.