Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34708171›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery protocols2021

Additional Normothermic Machine Perfusion Versus Hypothermic Machine Perfusion in Suboptimal Donor Kidney Transplantation: Protocol of a Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.

Elsaline Rijkse, Sarah Bouari, Hendrikus J A N Kimenai, Jeroen de Jonge, Ron W F de Bruin, Julia S Slagter, Martijn W F van den Hoogen, Jan N M IJzermans, Martin J Hoogduijn, Robert C Minnee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elsaline RijkseErasmus MC Transplant Institute, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3343-0424
Sarah BouariErasmus MC Transplant Institute, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1878-5427
Hendrikus J A N KimenaiErasmus MC Transplant Institute, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8536-2083
Jeroen de JongeErasmus MC Transplant Institute, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1131-027X
Ron W F de BruinErasmus MC Transplant Institute, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0045-8970
Julia S SlagterErasmus MC Transplant Institute, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2864-1219
Martijn W F van den HoogenErasmus MC Transplant Institute, Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0790-2405
Jan N M IJzermansErasmus MC Transplant Institute, Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3558-1039
Martin J HoogduijnErasmus MC Transplant Institute, Nephrology and Transplantation, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0217-8254
Robert C MinneeErasmus MC Transplant Institute, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9494-3717

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAgeing of the general population has led to an increase in the use of suboptimal kidneys from expanded criteria donation after brain death (ECD-DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors. However, these kidneys have inferior graft outcomes and lower rates of immediate function. Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) may improve outcomes of these suboptimal donor kidneys. Previous non-randomized studies have shown the safety of this technique and suggested its efficacy in improving the proportion of immediate functioning kidneys compared to static cold storage (SCS). However, its additional value to hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), which has already been proved superior to SCS, has not yet been established. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial aims to assess immediate kidney function after 120 minutes additional, end-ischemic NMP compared to HMP alone. Immediate kidney function is defined as no dialysis treatment in the first week after transplant. Eighty recipients on dialysis at the time of transplant who receive an ECD-DBD or DCD kidney graft are eligible for inclusion. In the NMP group, the donor kidney is taken of HMP upon arrival in the recipient hospital and thereafter put on NMP for 120 minutes at 37 degrees Celsius followed by transplantation. In the control group, donor kidneys stay on HMP until transplantation. The primary outcome is immediate kidney function. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Erasmus Medical Center (2020-0366). Results of this study will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. REGISTRATION: registered in HIGHLIGHTS: This is the first RCT to compare additional NMP to HMP alone.Extensive sampling will offer in-depth analysis of kidney physiology during NMP.This RCT may help identify biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes during NMP.Biomarkers can help develop NMP as assessment tool for declined kidneys.

Indexed as

Kidney transplantationOrgan preservation/methodsperfusionrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID34708171
PMCPMC8499718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.