Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34708131›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology research2021

Identification of a Prognosis-Related Risk Signature for Bladder Cancer to Predict Survival and Immune Landscapes.

Linhui Wang, Yutao Wang, Jianfeng Wang, Luanfeng Li, Jianbin Bi

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Early Onset Colorectal Cancer: Molecular Underpinnings Accelerating Occurrence.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Gasdermins in sepsis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linhui WangDepartment of Urology, China Medical University, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-0271
Yutao WangDepartment of Urology, China Medical University, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-5369
Jianfeng WangDepartment of Urology, China Medical University, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0414-6774
Luanfeng LiDepartment of Pharmacology, China Medical University, School of Pharmacy of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6197-0719
Jianbin BiDepartment of Urology, China Medical University, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-4765
First Hospital of China Medical University · CNChina Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder cancer is the tenth most common cancer worldwide. Valuable biomarkers in the field of diagnostic bladder cancer are urgently required.

methodHere, the gene expression matrix and clinical data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), GSE13507, GSE32894, and Mariathasan et al. Five prognostic genes were identified by the univariate, robust, and multivariate Cox's regression and were used to develop a prognosis-related model. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves and receiver operating characteristics were used to evaluate the model's effectiveness. The potential biological functions of the selected genes were analyzed using CIBERSORT and ESTIMATE algorithms. Cancer Therapeutics Response Portal (CTRP) and PRISM datasets were used to identify drugs with high sensitivity. Subsequently, using the bladder cancer (BLCA) cell lines, the role of TNFRSF14 was determined by Western blotting, cell proliferation assay, and 5-ethynyl-20-deoxyuridine assay.

resultsGSDMB, CLEC2D, APOL2, TNFRSF14, and GBP2 were selected as prognostic genes in bladder cancer patients. The model's irreplaceable reliability was validated by the training and validation cohorts. CD8+ T cells were highly infiltrated in the high-TNFRSF14-expression group, and M2 macrophages were the opposite. Higher expression of TNFRSF14 was associated with higher expression levels of LCK, interferon, MHC-I, and MHC-II, while risk score was the opposite. Many compounds with higher sensitivity for treating bladder cancer patients in the low-TNFRSF14-expression group were identified, with obatoclax being a potential drug most likely to treat patients in the low-TNFRSF14-expression group. Finally, the proliferation of BLCA cell lines was increased in the TNFRSF14-reduced group, and the differential expression was identified. TNFRSF14 plays a role in bladder cancer progression through the Wnt/

conclusionWe conducted a study to establish a 5-gene score model, providing reliable prediction for the outcome of bladder cancer patients and therapeutic drugs to individualize therapy. Our findings provide a signature that might help determine the optimal treatment for individual patients with bladder cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorDatasets as TopicGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateModels, GeneticPrecision MedicinePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsRNA-SeqROC CurveAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID34708131
PMCPMC8545590
OpenAlexW3207203232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.