Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34707979›Full record

ReviewAnnals of global health2021

Normal Physiologic Birth Continuing Professional Development: From a National Health Priority to Expanded Capacity.

John K Shakpeh, Mary W Tiah, Cecelia C Kpangbala-Flomo, Rita Florence Matte, Sodey C Lake, Susan D Altman, Tanya Tringali, Kerry Stalonas, Lloyd Goldsamt, Lily Zogbaum and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

John K ShakpehRedemption Hospital, Ministry of Health, Republic of Liberia, LR.
Mary W TiahLiberian Board for Nursing and Midwifery, LR.
Cecelia C Kpangbala-FlomoLiberian Board for Nursing and Midwifery, LR.ORCID 0000-0002-8804-5339
Rita Florence MatteNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, US.
Sodey C LakeNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, US.ORCID 0000-0001-9963-7500
Susan D AltmanNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, US.
Tanya TringaliNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, US.ORCID 0000-0002-0392-1564
Kerry StalonasNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, US.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-3230
Lloyd GoldsamtNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, US.ORCID 0000-0001-9401-4005
Lily ZogbaumNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, US.ORCID 0000-0003-2312-2935
Robin Toft KlarNew York University Rory Meyers College of Nursing, US.ORCID 0000-0003-1516-4078

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Republic of Liberia has experienced many barriers to maintaining the quality of its healthcare workforce. The Resilient and Responsive Health Systems (RRHS) Initiative supported by the U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) has responded to Liberian identified health priorities. Liberia's maternal morbidity and mortality rates continue to rank among the highest in the world. Recent country regulations have put forth required continuing professional development (CPD) for all licensed healthcare workers for re-licensure. Methods: The Model for Improvement was the guiding framework for this CPD to improve midwifery and nursing competencies in assisting birthing women. Two novel activities were used in the CPD. We tested the formal CPD application and approval process as this is a recent regulatory body policy. We also included the use of simulation and its processes as a pedagogical method. Over a two-year period, we developed a two-day CPD module, using didactic training and clinical simulation, for Liberian midwives. We then piloted the module in Liberia, training a group of 21 participants, including midwives and nurses, including pre- and post-test surveys as well as observational evaluation of participant skills. Findings: There were no significant changes in knowledge acquisition noted in the post-test. Small tests of change were implemented during the program, supporting the stages of the Model of Improvement. Observation of skill acquisition was done; however, using a formal observation checklist, such as an Observed Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE), would add more robust findings. The CPD and follow-up activity highlighted the need for human and financial support to maintain the simulation kits and to create sustainability for future trainings. Videotaping the didactic and simulation two-day continuing professional development train-the-trainer workshop expands the sustainability beyond newly prepared trainers. Simultaneous with this CPD, the Liberian Board for Nursing and Midwifery (LBNM) worked with a partner to create a CPD portal. The CPD partners created modules from the videos and have uploaded these modules to the LBNM's new CPD portal. Conclusions: Using a quality improvement model as a framework for developing and implementing CPDs provides a clear structure and supports the dynamic interactions in learning and clinical care. It is too soon to determine measurable health outcomes resulting from this project. Anecdotal feedback from clinicians and leaders was not directly related to the content of the CPD; however, it does demonstrate an increased awareness of examining changes in practice to support expanded health outcomes. Further research to examine methods and processes to determine the quality and safety outcomes of CPD trainings is necessary.

Indexed as

Health PrioritiesMidwiferyDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLearningObservational Studies as TopicPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34707979
PMCPMC8499709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.