Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34707914›Full record

ArticleGeriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation2021

Qualitative Evaluation of a Novel Educational Tool to Communicate Individualized Hip Fracture Prognostic Information to Patients and Surrogates: My Hip Fracture (My-HF).

Corita Vincent, Pete Wegier, Vincent Chien, Allison Miyoshi Kurahashi, Shiphra Ginsburg, Hedieh Molla Ghanbari, Jesse Isaac Wolfstadt, Peter Cram

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Corita VincentDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6287-258X
Pete WegierTemmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-136X
Vincent ChienDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Allison Miyoshi KurahashiTemmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Shiphra GinsburgDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hedieh Molla GhanbariDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jesse Isaac WolfstadtGranovsky Gluskin Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Peter CramDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto · CASinai Health System · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

Comparing hospitalization rates, outcomes, and treatment intensity for elderly patients across OECD countriesR01AG058878 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI Peter M Cram, Bruce E. Landon · 2019 to 2026
$3.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG058878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMortality and morbidity are high for older adults after hip fracture (HF), but patients and surrogate decision makers (SDMs) are typically unaware of the poor prognosis. We developed a novel educational tool, MATERIALS AND

methodsMy-HF provides information about: 1) anatomy and risk factors for HF; 2) Hip fracture treatment received; 3) individualized predicted risk of adverse events and 4) anticipated discharge trajectory. We conducted a qualitative usability study using a convenience sample of hospitalized, post-operative patients with acute HF or SDMs of patients who lacked decision-making capacity. We used semi-structured interviews to obtain feedback. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes and concepts.

resultsWe conducted interviews with 8 patients and 9 SDMs (mean age of interviewees 70.1 years, 41% female). My-HF was generally well received. Thematic analysis identified legibility and visual appeal, comprehension, numeracy, utility and reflection as prominent themes. Most respondents found My-HF to be useful in improving their understanding of HF and as a potential mechanism for sharing information with other care team members (including family and professionals). Suggestions for improvement of legibility, presentation of the individualized prognosis information and content were identified. DISCUSSION: Patients and SDMs are generally accepting of My-HF and found it useful for communicating individualized prognostic information. Feedback identified areas for improvement for future iterations of the tool.

conclusionMy-HF presents a means of addressing the gap in understanding of prognosis post-HF as a part of patient-centered care. Further evaluation will be needed to assess the impact of My-HF on patient and SDM reported outcomes as we transition from a paper to smart-phone enabled web application.

Indexed as

health educationhip fracturepatient education toolrisk communication

Identifiers

PMID34707914
PMCPMC8543715
OpenAlexW3210492659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.