Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34707837›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Two sexes respond equally to food restriction in a sexually dimorphic but not body mass dimorphic jumping spider.

Qin Li, Jing-Xin Liu, Bing Dong, Rong Xiao, Zhanqi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qin LiGuizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Agricultural Pest Management of the Mountainous Region Institute of Entomology Guizhou University Guiyang China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3901-2087
Jing-Xin LiuEnvironmental Education Center Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Mengla China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4127-7252
Bing DongCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Mengla China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4440-9014
Rong XiaoGuizhou Provincial Key Laboratory for Agricultural Pest Management of the Mountainous Region Institute of Entomology Guizhou University Guiyang China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9629-3095
Zhanqi ChenCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden Chinese Academy of Sciences Mengla China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2046-9335

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural selection favors animals that evolve developmental and behavioral responses that buffer the negative effects of food restrictions. These buffering responses vary both between species and within species. Many studies have shown sex-specific responses to environmental changes, usually in species with sexual size dimorphism (SSD), less found in species with weak or no SSD, which suggests that sizes of different sexes are experiencing different selections. However, previous studies usually investigated development and behavior separately, and the balanced situation where males and females of sexually dimorphic species respond in the same way to food restriction remains little known. Here, we investigated this in

Indexed as

fecundity selectionlife history traitssex rolesex‐specific responsesexual difference

Identifiers

PMID34707837
PMCPMC8525090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.