Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34707557›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021

Measurement and Analysis of Human Infant Crawling for Rehabilitation: A Narrative Review.

Qi L Xiong, Xiao Y Wu, Yuan Liu, Cong X Zhang, Wen S Hou

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qi L XiongKey Laboratory of Nondestructive Testing, Ministry of Education, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, China.
Xiao Y WuDepartment of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Yuan LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Cong X ZhangKey Laboratory of Nondestructive Testing, Ministry of Education, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, China.
Wen S HouDepartment of Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Chongqing University · CNChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNNanchang Hangkong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When a child shows signs of potential motor developmental disorders, early diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) impairment is beneficial. Known as the first CNS-controlled mobility for most of infants, mobility during crawling usually has been used in clinical assessments to identify motor development disorders. The current clinical scales of motor development during crawling stage are relatively subjective. Objective and quantitative measures of infant crawling afford the possibilities to identify those infants who might benefit from early intervention, as well as the evaluation of intervention progress. Thus, increasing researchers have explored objective measurements of infant crawling in typical and atypical developing infants. However, there is a lack of comprehensive review on infant-crawling measurement and analysis toward bridging the gap between research crawling analysis and potential clinical applications. In this narrative review, we provide a practical overview of the most relevant measurements in human infant crawling, including acquisition techniques, data processing methods, features extraction, and the potential value in objective assessment of motor function in infancy; meanwhile, the possibilities to develop crawling training as early intervention to promote the locomotor function for infants with locomotor delays are also discussed.

Indexed as

infant crawlingmeasurementmotor development disordersrehabilitationreview

Identifiers

PMID34707557
PMCPMC8544808
OpenAlexW3207345785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.