Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34707536›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Revisiting the Effects of Gender Diversity in Small Groups on Divergent Thinking: A Large-Scale Study Using Synchronous Electronic Brainstorming.

Laurine Peter, Nicolas Michinov, Maud Besançon, Estelle Michinov, Jacques Juhel, Genavee Brown, Eric Jamet, Anthony Cherbonnier, ProFAN Consortium

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Influence of Mating Context on Creativity: Insights from Simulated Dating Scenarios.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laurine PeterLaboratory of Psychology: Cognition, Behavior and Communication (LP3C), Department of Psychology, Univ Rennes, Rennes, France.
Nicolas MichinovLaboratory of Psychology: Cognition, Behavior and Communication (LP3C), Department of Psychology, Univ Rennes, Rennes, France.
Maud BesançonLaboratory of Psychology: Cognition, Behavior and Communication (LP3C), Department of Psychology, Univ Rennes, Rennes, France.
Estelle MichinovLaboratory of Psychology: Cognition, Behavior and Communication (LP3C), Department of Psychology, Univ Rennes, Rennes, France.
Jacques JuhelLaboratory of Psychology: Cognition, Behavior and Communication (LP3C), Department of Psychology, Univ Rennes, Rennes, France.
Genavee BrownPact Lab, Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Eric JametLaboratory of Psychology: Cognition, Behavior and Communication (LP3C), Department of Psychology, Univ Rennes, Rennes, France.
Anthony CherbonnierLaboratory of Psychology: Cognition, Behavior and Communication (LP3C), Department of Psychology, Univ Rennes, Rennes, France.
ProFAN Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined the effects of gender diversity in groups on creative performance, and no clear effect has been identified. Findings depend on situational cues making gender diversity more or less salient in groups. A large-scale study on two cohorts (

Indexed as

collaborative creativitydivergent thinkingelectronic brainstorminggender diversityidea generation“solo” groups

Identifiers

PMID34707536
PMCPMC8543034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.