Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34707506›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2021

Laser Speckle Contrast Analysis: Functional Evaluation of Microvascular Damage in Connective Tissue Diseases. Is There Evidence of Correlations With Organ Involvement, Such as Pulmonary Damage?

Barbara Ruaro, Cosimo Bruni, Barbara Wade, Elisa Baratella, Paola Confalonieri, Caterina Antonaglia, Pietro Geri, Marco Biolo, Marco Confalonieri, Francesco Salton

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara RuaroUnit of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Cosimo BruniDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Barbara WadeAOU City of Health and Science of Turin, Department of Science of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Elisa BaratellaDepartment of Radiology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Paola ConfalonieriUnit of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Caterina AntonagliaUnit of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Pietro GeriUnit of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Marco BioloUnit of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Marco ConfalonieriUnit of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Francesco SaltonUnit of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
University of Trieste · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) is a non-contact technique able to quantify peripheral blood perfusion (PBP) over large skin areas. LASCA has been used to study hand PBP in several clinical conditions. These include systemic sclerosis (SSc) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and LASCA showed that PBP was significantly lower in these conditions than in healthy subjects (HS). Moreover, it has been demonstrated that LASCA is a safe technique also able to monitor digital ulcer perfusion and their evolution in SSc patients, during systemic and local treatment. The use of LASCA, coupled with reactivity tests is commonplace in the field of microvascular function research. Post-occlusive hyperemia reactivity (POHR) and local thermal hyperemia, associated with laser techniques are reliable tests in the evaluation of perfusion in SSc patients. Other studies used laser speckled techniques, together with acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside iontophoresis, as specific tests of endothelium function. In conclusion, LASCA is a safe, non-contact reliable instrument for the quantification of PBP at skin level and can also be associated with reactivity tests to monitor disease progression and response to treatment in different connective tissue diseases.

Indexed as

blood perfusiondigital ulcerslaser speckle techniquesperipheral microcirculationsystemic lupus erythematosussystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID34707506
PMCPMC8542764
OpenAlexW3205439235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.