ArticleJournal of pain research2021
The Central Response of Electroacupuncture on Trigeminal Neuralgia Based on Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Protocol for a Pre-Experimental, Single-Centre, Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of an Expert Consensus on Electroacupuncture for Trigeminal Neuralgia Using the Delphi Method: A Study Protocol.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Effect of electroacupuncture on anxiety in patients with obesity: a protocol for a randomised, blinded, sham-controlled trial.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo verify the efficacy of electroacupuncture (EA) on classical trigeminal neuralgia (CTN), and to observe the brain functional status of patients with CTN and the intervention effects of EA on brain function by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Thirty CTN patients will be randomly divided into EA combined with carbamazepine group and carbamazepine group in 2:1 ratio by using a random number table. Patients in EA combined with carbamazepine will receive EA treatment and carbamazepine for four weeks. The carbamazepine group will only receive carbamazepine treatment. VAS (visual analogue scale), HAMA (Hamilton Anxiety Scale), HAMD (Hamilton Depression Scale) and SF-36 (short form 36 health survey) will be performed before, after four-week treatments and at three-month follow-up in CTN patients. Six CTN patients will be randomly selected from EA combined with carbamazepine group and carbamazepine group, respectively, before treatment, and twelve paired healthy participants will be recruited at the same time. The twelve CTN patients will be scanned by rs-fMRI before and after treatment, and the healthy participants will be scanned by rs-fMRI only at baseline. Regional homogeneity (ReHo) and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) analysis will be carried out to compare the dysfunctional brain regions between CTN patients and healthy participants, as well as the differences between two groups of patients with CTN after treatment.
trial registrationChiCTR-1900027873.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.