Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34707187›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Socioeconomic differences and persistent segregation of Italian territories during COVID-19 pandemic.

Giovanni Bonaccorsi, Francesco Pierri, Francesco Scotti, Andrea Flori, Francesco Manaresi, Stefano Ceri, Fabio Pammolli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Giovanni Bonaccorsi *Impact, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. giovanni.bonaccorsi@polimi.it.
Francesco Pierri *Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Francesco Scotti *Impact, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Andrea FloriImpact, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Francesco ManaresiScience, Technology and Innovation Directorate, Productivity and Business Dynamism Division, OECD, Paris, France.
Stefano CeriDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Fabio PammolliImpact, Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy. fabio.pammolli@polimi.it.
Politecnico di Milano · ITKantonsschule Schaffhausen · CHOrganisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lockdowns implemented to address the COVID-19 pandemic have disrupted human mobility flows around the globe to an unprecedented extent and with economic consequences which are unevenly distributed across territories, firms and individuals. Here we study socioeconomic determinants of mobility disruption during both the lockdown and the recovery phases in Italy. For this purpose, we analyze a massive data set on Italian mobility from February to October 2020 and we combine it with detailed data on pre-existing local socioeconomic features of Italian administrative units. Using a set of unsupervised and supervised learning techniques, we reliably show that the least and the most affected areas persistently belong to two different clusters. Notably, the former cluster features significantly higher income per capita and lower income inequality than the latter. This distinction persists once the lockdown is lifted. The least affected areas display a swift (V-shaped) recovery in mobility patterns, while poorer, most affected areas experience a much slower (U-shaped) recovery: as of October 2020, their mobility was still significantly lower than pre-lockdown levels. These results are then detailed and confirmed with a quantile regression analysis. Our findings show that economic segregation has, thus, strengthened during the pandemic.

Indexed as

PandemicsSARS-CoV-2Communicable Disease ControlCOVID-19HumansIncomeItalyMachine LearningPovertyQuarantineRegression AnalysisSocioeconomic FactorsTravel

Identifiers

PMID34707187
PMCPMC8551210
OpenAlexW3209218060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.