Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34706743›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2021

Monophyletic blowflies revealed by phylogenomics.

Liping Yan, Thomas Pape, Karen Meusemann, Sujatha Narayanan Kutty, Rudolf Meier, Keith M Bayless, Dong Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The genome sequence of a blow fly,Wellcome open research · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The genome sequence of a cluster fly,Wellcome open research · 2025
    Article
  12. The genome sequence of a cluster fly,Wellcome open research · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The genome sequence of a woodlouse fly,Wellcome open research · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Liping YanSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Thomas PapeNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karen MeusemannEvolutionary Biology & Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Sujatha Narayanan KuttyDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Rudolf MeierDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Keith M BaylessAustralian National Insect Collection, CSIRO National Research Collections Australia (NRCA), Canberra, Australia.
Dong ZhangSchool of Ecology and Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China. zhangdong_bjfu@bjfu.edu.cn.
Beijing Forestry University · CNAustralian National Insect Collection · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUMuseum für Naturkunde · DENational University of Singapore · SGNatural History Museum Aarhus · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlowflies are ubiquitous insects, often shiny and metallic, and the larvae of many species provide important ecosystem services (e.g., recycling carrion) and are used in forensics and debridement therapy. Yet, the taxon has repeatedly been recovered to be para- or polyphyletic, and the lack of a well-corroborated phylogeny has prevented a robust classification.

resultsWe here resolve the relationships between the different blowfly subclades by including all recognized subfamilies in a phylogenomic analysis using 2221 single-copy nuclear protein-coding genes of Diptera. Maximum likelihood (ML), maximum parsimony (MP), and coalescent-based phylogeny reconstructions all support the same relationships for the full data set. Based on this backbone phylogeny, blowflies are redefined as the most inclusive monophylum within the superfamily Oestroidea not containing Mesembrinellidae, Mystacinobiidae, Oestridae, Polleniidae, Sarcophagidae, Tachinidae, and Ulurumyiidae. The constituent subfamilies are re-classified as Ameniinae (including the Helicoboscinae, syn. nov.), Bengaliinae, Calliphorinae (including Aphyssurinae, syn. nov., Melanomyinae, syn. nov., and Toxotarsinae, syn. nov.), Chrysomyinae, Luciliinae, Phumosiinae, Rhiniinae stat. rev., and Rhinophorinae stat. rev. Metallic coloration in the adult is shown to be widespread but does not emerge as the most likely ground plan feature.

conclusionsOur study provides the first phylogeny of oestroid calyptrates including all blowfly subfamilies. This allows settling a long-lasting controversy in Diptera by redefining blowflies as a well-supported monophylum, and blowfly classification is adjusted accordingly. The archetypical blowfly trait of carrion-feeding maggots most likely evolved twice, and the metallic color may not belong to the blowfly ground plan.

Indexed as

CalliphoridaeDipteraAnimalsCell NucleusEcosystemPhylogenyCalyptrataeColorationGenomePhylogenyTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID34706743
PMCPMC8555136
OpenAlexW3208154002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.