Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34706733›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2021

The role of patient navigators in ambulatory care: overview of systematic reviews.

Hannah Budde, Gemma A Williams, Juliane Winkelmann, Laura Pfirter, Claudia B Maier

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07474584 (The OpRESTORE AI-Patient Navigator Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
16.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07474584 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The OpRESTORE AI-Patient Navigator Study: Developing and Testing an AI-enhanced Patient Navigator for UK Veterans With Service-related Physical Health Problems

TypeinterventionalSponsorImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustRan2026 to 2028Enrolled1,389ConditionsVeteranArmsAI-OpRESTORE healthcare navigator, OpRESTORE healthcare navigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Self-advocacy training within a peer navigation model in advanced cancer: a pilot study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cancer navigation in Africa: challenges, impacts, and future directions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Coproducing a health advocate intervention for pediatric liver transplant recipients using a human-centered design.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah BuddeLondon School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton St, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. hannah.budde@alumni.lse.ac.uk.
Gemma A WilliamsEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7979-9016
Juliane WinkelmannDepartment of Healthcare Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9873-3477
Laura PfirterMaecenata Institut für Philanthropie und Zivilgesellschaft in Berlin, Rungestr. 17, D-10179, Berlin, Germany.
Claudia B MaierDepartment of Healthcare Management, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623, Berlin, Germany. c.maier@tu-berlin.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7734-2258
London School of Economics and Political Science · GBTechnische Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient navigators have been introduced across various countries to enable timely access to healthcare services and to ensure completion of diagnosis and follow-up of care. There is an increasing evidence on the the role of patient navigation for patients and healthcare systems. The aim of this study was to analyse the evidence on patient navigation interventions in ambulatory care and to evaluate their effects on individuals and health system outcomes.

methodsAn overview of reviews was conducted, following a prespecified protocol. All patients in ambulatory care or transitional care setting were included in this review as long as it was related to the role of patient navigators. The study analysed patient navigators covering a wide range of health professionals such as physicians, nurses, pharmacists, social workers and lay health workers or community-based workers with no or very limited training. Studies including patient-related measures and health system-related outcomes were eligible for inclusion. A rigorous search was performed in multiple data bases. After reaching a high inter-rater agreement of 0.86, title and abstract screening was independently performed. Of an initial 14,248 search results and an additional 62 articles identified through the snowballing approach, a total of 7159 hits were eligible for title/abstract screening. 679  articles were included for full-text screening.

resultsEleven systematic reviews were included covering various patient navigation intervention in cancer care, disease screening, transitional care and for various chronic conditions and multimorbidity. Nine systematic reviews primarily tailored services to ethnic minorities or other disadvantaged groups. Patient navigators performed tasks such as providing education and counselling, translations, home visits, outreach, scheduling of appointments and follow-up. Eight reviews identified positive outcomes in expanding access to care, in particular for vulnerable patient groups. Two reviews on patient navigation in transitional care reported improved patient outcomes, hospital readmission rates and mixed evidence on quality of life and emergency department visits. Two reviews demonstrated improved patient outcomes for persons with various chronic conditions and multimorbidity.

conclusionsPatient navigators were shown to expand access to screenings and health services for vulnerable patients or population groups with chronic conditions who tend to underuse health services.

Indexed as

Patient NavigationAmbulatory CareDelivery of Health CareHumansQuality of LifeSystematic Reviews as TopicAccessCoordination of careEffectivenessOverview of reviewsPatient navigatorQualitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34706733
PMCPMC8555047
OpenAlexW3164112398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.