Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34706725›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2021

Estimating the potential impact of the Australian government's reformulation targets on household sugar purchases.

Daisy H Coyle, Maria Shahid, Elizabeth K Dunford, Jimmy Chun Yu Louie, Kathy Trieu, Matti Marklund, Bruce Neal, Jason H Y Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Daisy H CoyleFaculty of Medicine, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 5, 1 King St, Newtown, Australia. dcoyle@georgeinstitute.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8904-0671
Maria ShahidFaculty of Medicine, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 5, 1 King St, Newtown, Australia.
Elizabeth K DunfordFaculty of Medicine, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 5, 1 King St, Newtown, Australia.
Jimmy Chun Yu LouieFaculty of Medicine, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 5, 1 King St, Newtown, Australia.
Kathy TrieuFaculty of Medicine, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 5, 1 King St, Newtown, Australia.
Matti MarklundFaculty of Medicine, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 5, 1 King St, Newtown, Australia.
Bruce NealFaculty of Medicine, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 5, 1 King St, Newtown, Australia.
Jason H Y WuFaculty of Medicine, The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 5, 1 King St, Newtown, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCountries around the world are putting in place sugar reformulation targets for packaged foods to reduce excess sugar consumption. The Australian government released its voluntary sugar reformulation targets for nine food categories in 2020. We estimated the potential impact of these targets on household sugar purchases and examined differences by income. For comparison, we also modelled the potential impact of the UK sugar reduction targets on per capita sugar purchases as the UK has one of the most comprehensive sugar reduction strategies in the world.

methodsGrocery purchase data from a nationally representative consumer panel (n=7,188) in Australia was linked with a large database (FoodSwitch) with product-specific sugar content information for packaged foods (n=25,261); both datasets were collected in 2018. Potential reductions in per capita sugar purchases were calculated overall and by food category. Differences in sugar reduction across income level were assessed by analysis of variance.

resultsIn 2018, the total sugar acquired from packaged food and beverage purchases consumed at-home was 56.1 g/day per capita. Australia's voluntary reformulation targets for sugar covered 2,471/25,261 (9.8%) unique products in the FoodSwitch dataset. Under the scenario that all food companies adhered to the voluntary targets, sugar purchases were estimated to be reduced by 0.9 g/day per capita, which represents a 1.5% reduction in sugar purchased from packaged foods. However, if Australia adopted the UK targets, over twice as many products would be covered (n=4,667), and this would result in a more than four times greater reduction in sugar purchases (4.1 g/day per capita). It was also estimated that if all food companies complied with Australia's voluntary sugar targets, reductions to sugar would be slightly greater in low-income households compared with high-income households by 0.3 g/day (95%CI 0.2 - 0.4 g/day, p<0.001).

conclusionsSugar-reduction policies have the potential to substantially reduce population sugar consumption and may help to reduce health inequalities related to excess sugar consumption. However, the current reformulation targets in Australia are estimated to achieve only a small reduction to sugar intakes, particularly in comparison to the UK's sugar reduction program.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorSugarsAustraliaDietary CarbohydratesGovernmentHumansDietary CarbohydratesSugars

Identifiers

PMID34706725
PMCPMC8555094
OpenAlexW3211071979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.