Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34706676›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Association of identification of facility and transportation for childbirth with institutional delivery in high priority districts of Uttar Pradesh, India.

Divya Rajvanshi, John Anthony, Vasanthakumar Namasivayam, Bidyadhar Dehury, Ramesh Banadakoppa Manjappa, Ravi Prakash, Dhanunjaya Rao Chintada, Shagun Khare, Lisa Avery, Maryanne Crockett and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Divya RajvanshiIndia Health Action Trust, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh/ New Delhi, India. divya.rajvanshi@ihat.in.
John AnthonyIndia Health Action Trust, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh/ New Delhi, India.
Vasanthakumar NamasivayamInstitute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Bidyadhar DehuryIndia Health Action Trust, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh/ New Delhi, India.
Ramesh Banadakoppa ManjappaInstitute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Ravi PrakashIndia Health Action Trust, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh/ New Delhi, India.
Dhanunjaya Rao ChintadaIndia Health Action Trust, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh/ New Delhi, India.
Shagun KhareIndia Health Action Trust, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh/ New Delhi, India.
Lisa AveryInstitute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Maryanne CrockettInstitute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Shajy IsacIndia Health Action Trust, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh/ New Delhi, India.
Marissa BeckerIndia Health Action Trust, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh/ New Delhi, India.
James BlanchardInstitute of Global Public Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Shiva HalliIndia Health Action Trust, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh/ New Delhi, India.
University of Manitoba · CAIndia Health Action Trust · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely and skilled care is key to reducing maternal and neonatal mortality. Birth preparedness involves preparation for safe childbirth during the antenatal period to reach the appropriate health facility for ensuring safe delivery. Hence, understanding the factors associated with birth preparedness and its significance for safe delivery is essential. This paper aims to assess the levels of birth preparedness, its determinants and association with institutional deliveries in High Priority Districts of Uttar Pradesh, India.

methodsA community-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between June-October 2018 in the rural areas of 25 high priority districts of Uttar Pradesh, India. Simple random sampling was used to select 40 blocks among 294 blocks in 25 districts and 2646 primary sampling units within the selected blocks. The survey interviewed 9458 women who had a delivery 2 months prior to the survey. Descriptive statistics were included to characterize the study population. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the determinants of birth preparedness and to examine the association of birth preparedness with institutional delivery.

resultsAmong the 9458 respondents, 61.8% had birth preparedness (both facility and transportation identified) and 79.1% delivered in a health facility. Women in other caste category (aOR = 1.24, CI 1.06-1.45) and those with 10 or more years of education (aOR = 1.68, CI 1.46-1.92) were more likely to have birth preparedness. Antenatal care (ANC) service uptake related factors like early registration for ANC (aOR = 1.14, CI 1.04-1.25) and three or more front line worker contacts (aOR = 1.61, CI 1.46-1.79) were also found to be significantly associated with birth preparedness. The adjusted multivariate model showed that those who identified both facility and transport were seven times more likely to undergo delivery in a health facility (aOR = 7.00, CI 6.07-8.08).

conclusionThe results indicate the need for focussing on marginalized groups for improving birth preparedness. Increasing ANC registration in the first trimester of pregnancy, improving frontline worker contact, and optimum utilization of antenatal care check-ups for effective counselling on birth preparedness along with system level improvements could improve birth preparedness and consequently institutional delivery rates in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTransportationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansIndiaParturitionPregnancyPrenatal CareRural PopulationSocioeconomic FactorsAntenatal careBirth preparednessFrontline workerInstitutional deliveryUttar Pradesh

Identifiers

PMID34706676
PMCPMC8549204
OpenAlexW3209684742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.