Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34706398›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical radiation sciences2022

Immersive virtual reality simulated learning environment versus role-play for empathic clinical communication training.

Daniel Sapkaroski, Matthew Mundy, Matthew Richard Dimmock

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education - A review and expert commentary.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel SapkaroskiDepartment of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8094-0817
Matthew MundyPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Matthew Richard DimmockDepartment of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

Victorian Medical Radiation Practitioners Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of immersive virtual reality simulated learning environments (VR SLEs) for improving clinical communication can offer desirable qualities including repetition and determinism in a safe environment. The aim of this study was to establish whether the mode of delivery, VR SLE versus clinical role-play, could have a measurable effect on clinical empathic communication skills for MRI scenarios.

methodsA split-cohort study was performed with trainee practitioners (n = 70) and qualified practitioners (n = 9). Participants were randomly assigned to four groups: clinician VR (CVR), clinician role-play (CRP), trainee VR (TVR), and trainee RP (TRP). Clinical communication skills were assessed using two methods: firstly, a self-reported measure - the SE-12 communication questionnaire and, secondly, a training and assessment tool developed by a panel of experts.

resultsParticipants in the VR trainee (TVR) and clinician (CVR) groups reported 11% (P < 0.05) and 7.2% (P < 0.05) improvements in communication confidence post training, whereas trainees assigned to the role-play (TRP) intervention reported a 4.3% (P < 0.05) improvement. Empirical assessment of communication training scores assessing a participant's ability to select empathic statements showed the TVR group performed 5% better on average than their role-play counterparts (P < 0.05).

conclusionThe accuracy of participant's selection of appropriate empathic responses was shown to differ significantly following the training intervention designed to improve interactions with patients that present for an MRI scan. The results may demonstrate the capacity for immersion into an emotional narrative in a VR environment to increase the user's susceptibility for recalling and selecting empathic terminology.

Indexed as

Simulation TrainingVirtual RealityClinical CompetenceCohort StudiesCommunicationHumansCommunicationmedical imagingsimulated learning environmentvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID34706398
PMCPMC8892424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.