Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34706355›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021

The accuracy of helium ion CT based particle therapy range prediction: an experimental study comparing different particle and x-ray CT modalities.

L Volz, C-A Collins-Fekete, E Bär, S Brons, C Graeff, R P Johnson, A Runz, C Sarosiek, R W Schulte, J Seco

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Emerging technologies for cancer therapy using accelerated particles.Progress in particle and nuclear physics · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

L VolzDepartment of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0441-4350
C-A Collins-FeketeDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2464-8795
E BärDepartment of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7515-5611
S BronsHeidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Universitäts Klinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
C GraeffBiophysics, GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5296-7649
R P JohnsonDepartment of Physics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7850-3711
A RunzDepartment of Medical Physics in Radiation Therapy, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
C SarosiekDepartment of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2765-6187
R W SchulteDepartment of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7892-2756
J SecoDepartment of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9458-2202
German Cancer Research Center · DEGSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research · DEHeidelberg University · DELoma Linda University · USNorthern Illinois University · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

Translating Proton CT from the Physics Laboratory to Clinical ApplicationR01EB013118 · NIBIB · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI BASHKIROV, VLADIMIR A., SADROZINSKI, HARTMUT F.-W. · 2011 to 2014
$2.0M
Cancer Research UK C7893/A28990Medical Research Council MR/T040785/1NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB013118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work provides a quantitative assessment of helium ion CT (HeCT) for particle therapy treatment planning. For the first time, HeCT based range prediction accuracy in a heterogeneous tissue phantom is presented and compared to single-energy x-ray CT (SECT), dual-energy x-ray CT (DECT) and proton CT (pCT). HeCT and pCT scans were acquired using the US pCT collaboration prototype particle CT scanner at the Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center. SECT and DECT scans were done with a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash and converted to RSP. A Catphan CTP404 module was used to study the RSP accuracy of HeCT. A custom phantom of 20 cm diameter containing several tissue equivalent plastic cubes was used to assess the spatial resolution of HeCT and compare it to DECT. A clinically realistic heterogeneous tissue phantom was constructed using cranial slices from a pig head placed inside a cylindrical phantom (ø150 mm). A proton beam (84.67 mm range) depth-dose measurement was acquired using a stack of GafchromicTM EBT-XD films in a central dosimetry insert in the phantom. CT scans of the phantom were acquired with each modality, and proton depth-dose estimates were simulated based on the reconstructions. The RSP accuracy of HeCT for the plastic phantom was found to be 0.3 ± 0.1%. The spatial resolution for HeCT of the cube phantom was 5.9 ± 0.4 lp cm

Indexed as

HeliumProtonsAnimalsPhantoms, ImagingPlasticsSwineTomography, X-Ray ComputedX-RaysHeliumPlasticsProtonsdual-energy CThelium ionsparticle CTparticle therapyproton ctrange accuracytissue

Identifiers

PMID34706355
PMCPMC8792995
OpenAlexW3210149705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.