Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34706107›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2021

Re-ordering connections: UK healthcare workers' experiences of emotion management during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Anna Dowrick, Lucy Mitchinson, Katarina Hoernke, Sophie Mulcahy Symmons, Silvie Cooper, Sam Martin, Samantha Vanderslott, Norha Vera San Juan, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna DowrickNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2937-6728
Lucy MitchinsonMarie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, University College London, London, UK.
Katarina HoernkeInstitute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4825-980X
Sophie Mulcahy SymmonsInstitute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK.
Silvie CooperInstitute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0413-8325
Sam MartinOxford Vaccine Group, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Samantha VanderslottOxford Vaccine Group, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Norha Vera San JuanHealth Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.
Cecilia Vindrola-PadrosDepartment of Targeted Intervention and Rapid Research Evaluation and Appraisal Lab (RREAL), University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GBChurchill Hospital · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Marie Curie MCCC-FCO-11-U
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of disruptions to the organisation and delivery of healthcare services and efforts to re-order care through emotion management during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. Framing care as an affective practice, studying healthcare workers' (HCWs) experiences enables better understanding of how interactions between staff, patients and families changed as a result of the pandemic. Using a rapid qualitative research methodology, we conducted interviews with frontline HCWs in two London hospitals during the peak of the first wave of the pandemic and sourced public accounts of HCWs' experiences of the pandemic from social media (YouTube and Twitter). We conducted framework analysis to identify key factors disrupting caring interactions. Fear of infection and the barriers of physical distancing acted to separate staff from patients and families, requiring new affective practices to repair connections. Witnessing suffering was distressing for staff, and providing a 'good death' for patients and communicating care to families was harder. In addition to caring for patients and families, HCWs cared for each other. Infection control measures were important for limiting the spread of COVID-19 but disrupted connections that were integral to care, generating new work to re-order interactions.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsEmotionsHealth PersonnelHumansSARS-CoV-2United KingdomCOVID-19emotional labouremotion managementhealthcare workershospitalpandemicUK

Identifiers

PMID34706107
PMCPMC8652548
OpenAlexW3211316847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.