Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34706070›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of cancer2022

Can miRNAs be useful biomarkers in improving prognostic stratification in endometrial cancer patients? An update review.

Gloria Ravegnini, Francesca Gorini, Eugenia De Crescenzo, Antonio De Leo, Dario De Biase, Marco Di Stanislao, Patrizia Hrelia, Sabrina Angelini, Pierandrea De Iaco, Anna Myriam Perrone

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. [Predictive Value of A miRNA Signature for Distant Metastasis in Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Overview of miR-106a Regulatory Roles: from Cancer to Aging.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. miRNA-576-5p promotes endometrial cancer cell growth and metastasis by targeting ZBTB4.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Glycosylation and its research progress in endometrial cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Relevance ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gloria RavegniniDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7774-402X
Francesca GoriniDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Eugenia De CrescenzoDivision of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Antonio De LeoDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Dario De BiaseDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marco Di StanislaoDivision of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Patrizia HreliaDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Sabrina AngeliniDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Pierandrea De IacoDivision of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anna Myriam PerroneDivision of Oncologic Gynecology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological cancer, with annual incidence rates in Western countries ranging between 15 and 25 per 100 000 women. About 15% to 20% of patients with EC have high-risk disease and follow an aggressive clinical course. Unfortunately, the assessment of histologic parameters is poorly reproducible and conventional clinicopathological and molecular features do not reliably predict either the patient's response to the available treatments or the definition of personalized therapeutic approaches. In this context, the identification of novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, which can be integrated in the current classification schemes, represents an unmet clinical need and an important challenge. miRNAs are key players in cancer by regulating the expression of specific target genes. Their role in EC, in association with clinical and prognostic tumor biomarkers, has been investigated but, so far, with little consensus among the studies. The present review aims to describe the recent advances in miRNAs research in EC taking into consideration the current classification schemes and to highlight the most promising miRNAs. Finally, a perspective point of view sheds light on the challenges ahead in the landscape of EC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsendometrial cancermiRNAspersonalized medicineprognostic and diagnostic biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID34706070
PMCPMC9298718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.