ArticleRevista de saude publica2021
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the short version of COPSOQ II-Brazil.
Article in Revista de saude publica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Preventive Behavior Questionnaire for Older Workers in Brazil: Protocol for a Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Article
- Psychosocial risks and work ability among health workers throughout the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal follow-up study, Brazil, 2020-2023.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2026Article
- Predictors of quality of life in professors at public higher education institutions from the RESPIRA cohort: Brazilian prospective longitudinal study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sleep, health conditions and quality of life among professors at higher education institutions in Brazil: baseline data from the RESPIRA cohort.BMC public health · 2025Article
- COPSOQ III in China: Preliminary Validation of an International Instrument to Measure Psychosocial Work Factors.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Psychosocial work environment beyond WEIRD: meta-analytic and psychometric evidence on the Job Content Questionnaire.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Psychosocial Risk Factors at Work and Sleep Quality in Healthcare Workers - A Cross-Sectional Study.Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Article
- Psychosocial work aspects, work ability, mental health and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates of on-site and remote Brazilian workers during the COVID-19 pandemic - a longitudinal study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Quality of work life for health professions in Colombia's adult critical care: An integrative analysis.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Sleep Quality as a Mediator of Burnout, Stress and Multisite Musculoskeletal Pain in Healthcare Workers: A Longitudinal Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Association between offensive behaviors and burnout and depression risks in health workers.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2023Article
- Poor Health Conditions among Brazilian Healthcare Workers: The Study Design and Baseline Characteristics of the HEROES Cohort.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Occupational Profile, Psychosocial Aspects, and Work Ability of Brazilian Workers During COVID-19 Pandemic: IMPPAC Cohort.Safety and health at work · 2022Article
- Critical analysis of psychosocial factors at work within the Risk Management Program of Regulatory Standard-1.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMTArticle
- Hospital management and psychosocial risks: challenges and opportunities in the face of regulatory transition.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMTArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTranslate and culturally adapt the short version of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) into Brazilian Portuguese (COPSOQ II-Br) and evaluate its psychometric properties.
methodsTranslation and cultural adaptation followed the standardized guidelines. Structural validity was assessed using exploratory factorial analysis. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC3,1) and internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha. Floor and ceiling effect was considered acceptable if less than 15% of participants reported the lowest or highest scores. Measurement error was assessed by standard error of measurement (SEM), while construct validity was tested by correlating the COPSOQ II-Br, the Job Content Questionnaire and the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire.
resultsThe study evaluated a total of 211 civil servants and service providers in the test and 157 in the retest. After cross-cultural adaptation, the COPSOQ II-Br structure comprised seven domains and 11 dimensions. Most dimensions showed acceptable floor and ceiling effects, excepting "Work family conflicts" (floor effect of 26.1%), and "Meaning and commitment" and "Job satisfaction," with ceiling floor of 27.5% and 22.3%, respectively. Cronbach's alpha values reached the recommended levels (varied between 0.70 and 0.87). Test-retest reliability indicated that all dimensions had ICC between 0.71 and 0.81. SEM ranged from 0.6 to 2.2 and the construct validity showed good results with the tested instruments (significant positive and negative correlations).
conclusionsAll psychometric properties of the short version COPSOQ II-Br are suitable for use in Brazil. The instrument is thus validated and can be used by occupational health and human resources professionals to evaluate psychosocial working conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.