ArticleCoDAS2021
Multiprofessional screening protocol for dysphagia in patients with HIV infection: elaboration and content validity.
Article in CoDAS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dysphagia and pill swallowing in HIV/AIDS in South Africa: Results of a scoping review.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo elaborate and validate a multiprofessional protocol to identify the risk of dysphagia in people with HIV at the time of hospitalization.
methodsAfter bibliographic review, the dysphagia screening protocol created was submitted to the analysis of HIV/ Aids expert judges and target audience in the application of this instrument to perform content validity. These evaluators could suggest changes to the protocol, judging clarity, pertinence, and comprehensiveness. The CVI 0.78 was used to confirm the validity of the results.
resultsThe protocol was created including aspects related to oral and pharyngeal swallowing, and the final score was calculated based on the risks for clinical complications. The instrument presented CVI above 0.78 for all items in the two validation phases, as well as total CVI of 0.92.
conclusionBased on the obtained data, it was possible to create and validate the screening protocol from the point of view of appearance and content, once it presented total CVI above the minimum value stipulated in the validation of the expert judges and the target public, obtaining an adequate result for the protocol. Therefore, we can consider the resolution instrument, with the capacity to fulfill what was proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.