Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34705664›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2021

Digitally Disconnected: Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on the Digital Divide and Potential Solutions.

Maria Alcocer Alkureishi, Zi-Yi Choo, Ali Rahman, Kimberly Ho, Jonah Benning-Shorb, Gena Lenti, Itzel Velázquez Sánchez, Mengqi Zhu, Sachin D Shah, Wei Wei Lee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06598436 (Achieving Chronic Care equiTy by leVeraging the Telehealth Ecosystem), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06598436 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Achieving Chronic Care equiTy by leVeraging the Telehealth Ecosystem

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2024 to 2028Enrolled600ConditionsDiabetesArmsDigital Health Coaching (Patient-Level Intervention), Practice Facilitation (Clinic-Level Intervention)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Evaluating a virtual reality visual fields analyzer in an urban, underserved glaucoma & glaucoma suspect patient populations to identify disparities.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Alcocer AlkureishiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2250-4985
Zi-Yi ChooPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5975-8874
Ali RahmanUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1246-5676
Kimberly HoNew York University Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4813-5169
Jonah Benning-ShorbUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0555-9578
Gena LentiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4015-9847
Itzel Velázquez SánchezUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6357-6566
Mengqi ZhuDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5733-8131
Sachin D ShahDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4450-5660
Wei Wei LeeDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7694-1304
University of Chicago · USLong Island University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs telemedicine utilization increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, divergent usage patterns for video and audio-only telephone visits emerged. Older, low-income, minority, and non-English speaking Medicaid patients are at highest risk of experiencing technology access and digital literacy barriers. This raises concern for disparities in health care access and widening of the "digital divide," the separation of those with technological access and knowledge and those without. While studies demonstrate correlation between racial and socioeconomic demographics and technological access and ability, individual patients' perspectives of the divide and its impacts remain unclear.

objectiveWe aimed to interview patients to understand their perspectives on (1) the definition, causes, and impact of the digital divide; (2) whose responsibility it is to address this divide, and (3) potential solutions to mitigate the digital divide.

methodsBetween December 2020 and March 2021, we conducted 54 semistructured telephone interviews with adult patients and parents of pediatric patients who had virtual visits (phone, video, or both) between March and September 2020 at the University of Chicago Medical Center (UCMC) primary care clinics. A grounded theory approach was used to analyze interview data.

resultsPatients were keenly aware of the digital divide and described impacts beyond health care, including employment, education, community and social contexts, and personal economic stability. Patients described that individuals, government, libraries, schools, health care organizations, and even private businesses all shared the responsibility to address the divide. Proposed solutions to address the divide included conducting community technology needs assessments and improving technology access, literacy training, and resource awareness. Recognizing that some individuals will never cross the divide, patients also emphasized continued support of low-tech communication methods and health care delivery to prevent widening of the digital divide. Furthermore, patients viewed technology access and literacy as drivers of the social determinants of health (SDOH), profoundly influencing how SDOH function to worsen or improve health disparities.

conclusionsPatient perspectives provide valuable insight into the digital divide and can inform solutions to mitigate health and resulting societal inequities. Future work is needed to understand the digital needs of disconnected individuals and communities. As clinical care and delivery continue to integrate telehealth, studies are needed to explore whether having a video or audio-only phone visit results in different patient outcomes and utilization. Advocacy efforts to disseminate public and private resources can also expand device and broadband internet access, improve technology literacy, and increase funding to support both high- and low-tech forms of health care delivery for the disconnected.

Indexed as

digital dividepatient experiencequalitative studytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34705664
PMCPMC8675564
OpenAlexW3211237709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.