Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34705551›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2022

Differential Effects of Early-Life and Postweaning Galacto-oligosaccharide Intervention on Colonic Bacterial Composition and Function in Weaning Piglets.

Shiyi Tian, Jue Wang, Jing Wang, Weiyun Zhu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Galacto-Oligosaccharides Reshape MucinJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. AAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shiyi Tian *National Center for International Research on Animal Gut Nutrition, Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center of Animal Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural Universitygrid.27871.3b, Nanjing, China.
Jue Wang *National Center for International Research on Animal Gut Nutrition, Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center of Animal Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural Universitygrid.27871.3b, Nanjing, China.
Jing WangNational Center for International Research on Animal Gut Nutrition, Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center of Animal Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural Universitygrid.27871.3b, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9496-6276
Weiyun ZhuNational Center for International Research on Animal Gut Nutrition, Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Microbiology, National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center of Animal Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural Universitygrid.27871.3b, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9222-6581
Nanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, we proved that the early-life galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) intervention could improve the colonic function by altering the bacterial composition in suckling piglets. However, whether the early-life GOS (ELG) intervention could have a long influence on the colonic microbiota and whether the combined ELG and postweaning GOS (PWG) intervention would have an interacting effect on maintaining colonic health in weaning piglets remain to be explored. In this study, we illustrated the differential effects of the ELG and PWG interventions on colonic microbiota and colonic function of weaning piglets. Our results showed that the ELG and PWG interventions decreased the frequency of diarrhea in weaning piglets while the PWG intervention increased colonic indexes. After 16S rRNA gene MiSeq sequencing of the gut bacteria belonging to different colonic niches (mucosa and digesta), the increase in the α-diversity of the colonic mucosal bacteria during PWG intervention was revealed. In addition, we found that both the ELG and PWG interventions enriched the relative abundances of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) producers in different colonic niches and increased the total SCFA concentration in colonic digesta. These changes selectively modulated the mRNA expression levels of pattern recognition receptors and barrier proteins in the colonic mucosa. Of note, the combined effect of ELG and PWG effectively enhanced colonic SCFA producer enrichment and upregulated the butyrate concentration. Meanwhile, the expression levels of MyD88-NF-κB signaling and the proinflammatory cytokines were markedly reduced under the combined effect of ELG and PWG.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaColonEcosystemOligosaccharidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineWeaningOligosaccharidesRNA, Ribosomal, 16Scolonic microbiotaGalacto-oligosaccharidesgut functionpiglets

Identifiers

PMID34705551
PMCPMC8752138
OpenAlexW3209726419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.