Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34705433›Full record

ReviewACS nano2021

Nanodiagnostics to Face SARS-CoV-2 and Future Pandemics: From an Idea to the Market and Beyond.

Giulio Rosati, Andrea Idili, Claudio Parolo, Celia Fuentes-Chust, Enric Calucho, Liming Hu, Cecilia de Carvalho Castro E Silva, Lourdes Rivas, Emily P Nguyen, José F Bergua and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS nano, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Rationally Designed DNA-Based Scaffolds and Switching Probes for Protein Sensing.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Nanomaterial and interface advances in immunoassay biosensors.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Giulio RosatiInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0227-4561
Andrea IdiliInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6004-270X
Claudio ParoloInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9481-4408
Celia Fuentes-ChustInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8945-8514
Enric CaluchoInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Liming HuInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8666-9287
Cecilia de Carvalho Castro E SilvaInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3933-1838
Lourdes RivasInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1510-5927
Emily P NguyenInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4299-2055
José F BerguaInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5969-193X
Ruslan Alvárez-DidukInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9876-1574
José MuñozInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Christophe JunotUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, INRAE Departement Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé SPI, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex, France.
Oriol PenonAsphalion, Carrer de Tarragona 151-157, 08014 Barcelona, Spain.
Dominique MonferrerAsphalion, Carrer de Tarragona 151-157, 08014 Barcelona, Spain.
Emmanuel DelamarcheIBM Research-Zurich, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8753-8895
Arben MerkoçiInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia, Edifici ICN2 Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2486-8085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic made clear how our society requires quickly available tools to address emerging healthcare issues. Diagnostic assays and devices are used every day to screen for COVID-19 positive patients, with the aim to decide the appropriate treatment and containment measures. In this context, we would have expected to see the use of the most recent diagnostic technologies worldwide, including the advanced ones such as nano-biosensors capable to provide faster, more sensitive, cheaper, and high-throughput results than the standard polymerase chain reaction and lateral flow assays. Here we discuss why that has not been the case and why all the exciting diagnostic strategies published on a daily basis in peer-reviewed journals are not yet successful in reaching the market and being implemented in the clinical practice.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCOVID-19 TestingHumansSARS-CoV-2biosensorsbottlenecksCOVID-19nanodiagnosticsoutbreaksphases of test developmentSARS-CoV-2testing methods

Identifiers

PMID34705433
PMCPMC8565461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.