Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34705268›Full record

ArticleCancer2022

Long-term outcomes in patients with advanced and/or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who completed 2 years of immune checkpoint inhibitors or achieved a durable response after discontinuation without disease progression: Multicenter, real-world data (KCSG LU20-11).

Hongsik Kim, Dong-Wan Kim, Miso Kim, Youngjoo Lee, Hee Kyung Ahn, Jang Ho Cho, Il Hwan Kim, Yun-Gyoo Lee, Seong-Hoon Shin, Song Ee Park and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Journey: From Early Promise to Lasting Impact.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Hongsik KimDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1232-9439
Dong-Wan KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Miso KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4064-4199
Youngjoo LeeDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0180-189X
Hee Kyung AhnDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jang Ho ChoDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Il Hwan KimDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae-Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Yun-Gyoo LeeDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2156-5081
Seong-Hoon ShinDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Song Ee ParkDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jiyoon JungDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Eun Joo KangDivision of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Myung-Ju AhnDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5740-9654
Kangbuk Samsung Hospital · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRChung-Ang University · KRGachon University Gil Medical Center · KRInje University Haeundae Paik Hospital · KRKorea University · KRKosin University Gospel Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital · KRYeungnam University Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown significant improvements in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One of the major issues with ICIs is determining the optimal treatment duration.

methodsThis multicenter, retrospective study analyzed clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC who completed 2 years of ICI therapy or were treated for more than 6 months and then discontinued ICIs without disease progression at 11 medical centers in Korea between August 2017 and December 2020.

resultsNinety-six patients who completed 2 years of ICIs were reviewed. The median durations of treatment and follow-up were 24.0 and 33.9 months, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 85.4%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) periods were not reached. After completion, the PFS and OS rates were 81.1% and 96.4%, respectively, at 12 months. Forty-three patients were identified who discontinued ICIs without disease progression: 26 (60.5%) for adverse events and 17 (39.5%) for other causes. The median durations of treatment and follow-up were 10.5 and 21.2 months, respectively. The ORR was 90.7%. The median PFS and OS periods were not reached. After discontinuation, the PFS and OS rates were 71.0% and 90.0%, respectively, at 12 months.

conclusionsA significantly high proportion of patients who completed 2 years of ICI therapy continued to experience long-term PFS. Even if ICIs are discontinued after 6 months in patients without disease progression, they may achieve a durable response and facilitate long-term survival. LAY SUMMARY: The optimal treatment duration for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains to be determined. This study reports the long-term outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who completed 2 years of ICI therapy or achieved a durable response after the discontinuation of ICIs without disease progression in real-world practice. A significantly high proportion of patients who completed 2 years of ICIs continued to experience long-term progression-free survival. In addition, even if ICIs are discontinued after 6 months in patients without disease progression, they may achieve a durable response and facilitate long-term survival.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsRetrospective StudiesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsdiscontinuationduration of treatmentimmune checkpoint inhibitorimmunotherapylong-term survivalnon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID34705268
PMCPMC9297884
OpenAlexW3210402563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.