ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022
The long-term survival in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: experience from a single center in China.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Programmed Follow-up and Quality Control of Treatment Techniques Enhance Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Management: Lessons From a Multidisciplinary Team.Korean circulation journal · 2024Article
- Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension in Females: Clinical Features and Survival.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022Article
- Therapeutic alternatives in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: from pulmonary endarterectomy to balloon pulmonary angioplasty to medical therapy. State of the art from a multidisciplinary team.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The long-term prognosis of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) receiving different treatments is deserved to be analyzed in modern era of CTEPH treatment. From 2013 to 2019, a total of 364 patients diagnosed with CTEPH were retrospectively included, 14 patients were lost during follow-up. Among 350 patients included in the final analysis: 123 underwent pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), 121 received balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA), and 106 treated with targeted drug alone. The median period of follow-up was 51.2 months, the estimated survival at 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year was 97.1%, 93.3%, 86.9%, and 82.0% for the whole cohort; 100%, 99.20%, 96.5% and 92.5% in PEA group; 98.4%, 97.4%, 95.3% and 89.3% in BPA group;92.5%, 81.9%, 70.1% and 66.8% in patients who received targeted drug alone. In comparing with targeted treatment along, results of multivariate Cox analysis after adjusting the confounders showed that receiving PEA decreased the risk of death by 83% (HR [hazard ratio] 0.17, 95% CI [Confidence interval] 0.07-0.44) and receiving BPA decreased the risk of death by 89% (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.04-0.29). In conclusion, the estimated survival of CTEPH patients at 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year was 97.1%, 93.3%, 86.9%, and 82.0% respectively. The intervention of revascularization, including PEA and BPA, were preferred than treating with targeted drug alone in the view of long-term prognosis of CTEPH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.