ArticleGenetica2022
The statistical power of genome-wide association studies for threshold traits with different frequencies of causal variants.
Article in Genetica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging low-cost short-read sequencing: revolutionizing complex trait genetics.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomic regions, candidate genes, and pleiotropic variants associated with physiological and anatomical indicators of heat stress response in lactating sows.BMC genomics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of incidence rate, heritability, and polygenic variance on the statistical power of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for threshold traits. Different incidence rates of threshold trait (1, 3, 5, 10, 25, 40, 50, 60, 75 and 90%), heritability (10 and 25%), and polygenic variance ratio (0 and 25%) were simulated separately for common (MAF ≥ 0.05), low-frequency (0.05 > MAF ≥ 0.01), and rare (MAF < 0.01) variants. Association studies were performed by logistic and linear mixed models. The highest statistical powers were observed in common and low-frequency variants with an incidence of 25-50% and 10-40%, respectively, but for rare variants, the highest statistical power was observed at low incidence. For all causal variant frequencies, the estimated heritability decline with an increase in incidence rate. We found high statistical power for traits with high heritability. In contrast, those with a high polygenic variance ratio have lower statistical power to detect common causal variants using a linear mixed model. These results demonstrate that the incidence rate of threshold traits, heritability, and polygenic variance may affect the statistical power of GWAS. Therefore, it is recommended that the effect of incidence rate, heritability, and polygenic variance be considered in designing GWAS for threshold traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34705138What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.