Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34705138›Full record

ArticleGenetica2022

The statistical power of genome-wide association studies for threshold traits with different frequencies of causal variants.

Hassan Khanzadeh, Navid Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, Shahrokh Ghovvati

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hassan KhanzadehDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41635-1314, Iran.
Navid Ghavi Hossein-ZadehDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41635-1314, Iran. nhosseinzadeh@guilan.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9458-5860
Shahrokh GhovvatiDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, 41635-1314, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of incidence rate, heritability, and polygenic variance on the statistical power of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for threshold traits. Different incidence rates of threshold trait (1, 3, 5, 10, 25, 40, 50, 60, 75 and 90%), heritability (10 and 25%), and polygenic variance ratio (0 and 25%) were simulated separately for common (MAF ≥ 0.05), low-frequency (0.05 > MAF ≥ 0.01), and rare (MAF < 0.01) variants. Association studies were performed by logistic and linear mixed models. The highest statistical powers were observed in common and low-frequency variants with an incidence of 25-50% and 10-40%, respectively, but for rare variants, the highest statistical power was observed at low incidence. For all causal variant frequencies, the estimated heritability decline with an increase in incidence rate. We found high statistical power for traits with high heritability. In contrast, those with a high polygenic variance ratio have lower statistical power to detect common causal variants using a linear mixed model. These results demonstrate that the incidence rate of threshold traits, heritability, and polygenic variance may affect the statistical power of GWAS. Therefore, it is recommended that the effect of incidence rate, heritability, and polygenic variance be considered in designing GWAS for threshold traits.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMultifactorial InheritancePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAssociation studyCausal variants frequenciesHeritabilityIncidenceStatistical powerThreshold traits

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.