Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34705106›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Prognostic factors for outcome following lumbar spine fusion surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Retze J Achttien, Andrew Powell, Konstantinos Zoulas, J Bart Staal, Alison Rushton

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05466110 (sPinal coRd stimulatiOn coMpared With Lumbar InStrumEntation for Low Back Pain After Previous Lumbar Decompression), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05466110 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

sPinal coRd stimulatiOn coMpared With Lumbar InStrumEntation for Low Back Pain After Previous Lumbar Decompression (PROMISE): a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital AugsburgRan2023 to 2025Enrolled84ConditionsFailed Back Surgery Syndrome, SCS, Neuromodulation, Spinal Cord StimulationArmsSpinal Cord Stimulation, Spinal Fusion Surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient-reported outcomes and their associated factors at 1- and 2-year follow-up after lumbar spine surgery: a surgery registry study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The influence of preoperative 12-item veterans rand physical component scores on outcomes following cervical disc replacement.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Retze J AchttienHAN University of Applied Science, Research Group Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Nijmegen, Netherlands. Retze.Achttien@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9379-9402
Andrew PowellBritish Canoeing, Lee Valley Whitewater Centre, English Institute of Sport, Station Road, Waltham Cross, Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6376-1347
Konstantinos ZoulasPolyclinic De Lisieux, 175 Rue Roger Aini, 14100, Lisieux, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2986-5967
J Bart StaalHAN University of Applied Science, Research Group Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0083-6380
Alison RushtonSchool of Physical, Therapy Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8114-7669
HAN University of Applied Sciences · NLEnglish Institute of Sport · GBWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this study was to identify and evaluate the value of prognostic factors related to disability, pain and quality of life (QoL) for adult patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery (LSFS).

methodsTwo reviewers independently searched the literature, assessed eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Key electronic databases were searched [PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PEDro and ZETOC] using pre-defined terms [e.g. LSFS] to 20/9/2020; with additional searching of journals, reference lists and unpublished literature. Prospective cohort studies with ≥ 12-month follow-up after LSFS were included. Narrative synthesis was based on recommendations by Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group. The GRADE tool enabled assessment of certainty of evidence. Prognostic factors and outcome were analysed and summarised when examined in ≥ 2 studies and when results pointed in the same direction in ≥ 75% of studies.

resultsSixteen studies (n =  8388, 2 low and 14 high risk of bias) were included with 39 prognostic factors identified. There is low certainty evidence that higher pre-operative severity of leg pain predicts greater improvement of leg pain and that pre-operative working predicts less post-operative disability both at 1-2-year follow-up. Other found associations were of very low certainty evidence.

conclusionNo moderate to high certainty evidence exists. Use of leg pain and pre-operative working may be valuable predictors of outcome to inform clinical decision-making and advice regarding LSFS surgery. There is need for adequately powered low-risk-of-bias prospective observational studies to further investigate candidate prognostic factors.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSpinal FusionAdultBiasHumansObservational Studies as TopicPrognosisProspective StudiesLow back painLumbar fusionOutcomePredictorsPrognostic

Identifiers

PMID34705106
OpenAlexW3211246005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.